That is a large claim you are making on the health issue. Would you have some research data to back that up?
I sure dont, and Im no scientist, but thats why I feel it is a large issue that needs to be researched more before the entire industry starts pushing DDGS into cattle.
Just something to think about:
In the 40s Dr. Francis Pottinger conducted an experiment for close to 15 years, on 900 cats to determine what effects processed foods have on the body. Without getting into all the his methods.... Groups of cats were either fed real foods or were fed denatured foods (pasteurized, evaporated, and condensed milk).
Definition of denatured from Websters : "
to modify the molecular structure of (as a protein or DFNA) especially by heat, acid, alkali, or ultraviolet radiation so as to destroy or diminish some of the original properties and especially the specific biological activity" Would DDGs not be considered denatured?
Over 4 generations he found the following in the groups fed the denatured foods:
1st gen. developed diseases and illnesses near end of life.
2nd gen. developed diseases and illnesses in middle of life
3rd gen. developed diseases and illnesses in beginning of life, and many died before six months of age
4th gen. - no 4th gen. was produced.... 3rd gen parents were sterile, or the 4th gen cats were aborted before birth.
Yes, i know its cats, in a controlled environment, and how much can we take from this and apply it to humans or cattle? I really dont know, but I personally find it and interesting study.