Connealy Consensus 7229 on heifers

Help Support CattleToday:

I have not personally used him. Used several of his sons. His ced of 5 bw of 1.9 at over 90% accuracy, I wouldn't want him in my heifers. I would check out Connealy comrade. 7229 son
 
I have not personally used him. Used several of his sons. His ced of 5 bw of 1.9 at over 90% accuracy, I wouldn't want him in my heifers. I would check out Connealy comrade. 7229 son
 
Thanks for the advice!

Anyone have any experience with Connealy Concord?
 
I don't know how it will turn out, I bred 40 heifers to Concord in the fall, conventional semen
 
There are a lot of variables that makes recommending a bull a heifer bull. After all everyone calves heifers just a bit differently. Size, age, breed and environment all are different. Crossbred vs. straight bred can make big difference also. Fall calving vs. Spring calving is certainly a big variable.

I wouldn't necessarily use 7229 on first calvers because there are better options but it could be done if one deems it necessary.
 
Ned Jr.":1gf607zf said:
Thanks for the advice!

Anyone have any experience with Connealy Concord?
I have four Concord heifer calves out of registered Angus females -- 3 cows, 1 first-calf heifer -- that were born in March. We used the ST Genetics female sexed semen. They are only around 3 to 4 weeks old so hard to tell how they'll turn out, but I like what I see so far. Birth weights ranged from 70 to 84 pounds, no calving issues, and the calves were quite vigorous at birth and got up quickly and nursed quickly. I will probably use Concord again a little this year on a couple of first-time heifers.
 
We have about 30 heifers out of Mill Bar...a 7229 son. They are only about 3 months old but they are turning the crank...as are their brothers. There are alot of folks keeping heifers out of 7229 and his sons...for what that is worth.
 

Latest posts

Top