Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Recipes & Cooking
At least they encouraged buying beef
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="greybeard" data-source="post: 1677467" data-attributes="member: 18945"><p>A tip for websites that drop a blurb about needing a subscription or signing up before being able to read the article....</p><p>If on a computer or laptop, as <u>soon</u> as text or the headline appears on a website, click the 'X' at the top of the browser. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]3914[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>That, stops the website from loading cookies that are searching for a subscription and you can go ahead and read the article in most cases. I don't usually read anything from WaPo or NYT but sometimes I want to see what the opposition is saying and the x thing works on both. Also stops the "We noticed you are using an ad blocker" thing. It does not work on Wall St Journal.</p><p></p><p>What the opinion piece is saying is that if you look at serving sizes, filet mignon is not as bad a deal as it might first seem.</p><p>Some excerpts:</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>"Unlike some other wildly popular foods I like, nobody is going to say my endorsement of filet mignon (aka tenderloin) is contrarian. Everybody likes filet: That's why filet is so expensive! But I mean it's the best steak for you to make at home.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Filet's superior tenderness is why it commands such a high price. But it has other advantages, too. Its tenderness makes it very simple to prepare, because it doesn't need to be tenderized (I'll describe my preferred method below.) Its small cross section makes it simple to portion: Steaks around an inch-and-a-half thick weigh about half a pound, meaning each diner can have a whole steak without getting beef overload. And it's much lower in fat than other premium steaks, like rib eye and strip.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>And while filet is expensive as beef cuts go, cooking at home is a frugal activity. If you've been cooking at home more, you have room to splurge on ingredients, especially if you get a good value on your meat.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>You could pay over $30 per pound for beef tenderloin, but lately I've been buying tenderloin steaks from Stop & Shop at $18 per pound, and I've been very satisfied with the quality. At that price, you're paying about $8 per person for a 7-ounce steak — add in some rice or potatoes and a vegetable, and you're way below what it would cost to order takeout..</em></p><p></p><h2><strong><em>Go ahead, treat yourself</em></strong></h2><p><em>Filet has a "special occasion" aura, but how special does the occasion really need to be to treat yourself to an $8 piece of meat?</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Rough day? Busy day? Need to cook at home and want something easy yet indulgent, without too much fat? Have I got the steak for you.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>It's a filet.</em></p><p><em>"</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The writer does pay a bit of dis-service to other steaks, (ribeye/tbones/NYstrip) saying they are too big for fatty for most people, but still, it's a good article that encourages the city consumer to look hard at what they are really getting for their purchase.</p><p><em>E</em>verybody keeps a few taters around, or rice, some canned or fresh frozen veggies so it's only another couple of bucks to finish off a meal. Heck, I go to Whataburger, get a #1 cheeseburger combo (burger/fries and med drink) and I've spent $8 and change.</p><p>I love my Whataburger, but steak is steak!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="greybeard, post: 1677467, member: 18945"] A tip for websites that drop a blurb about needing a subscription or signing up before being able to read the article.... If on a computer or laptop, as [U]soon[/U] as text or the headline appears on a website, click the 'X' at the top of the browser. [ATTACH type="full"]3914[/ATTACH] That, stops the website from loading cookies that are searching for a subscription and you can go ahead and read the article in most cases. I don't usually read anything from WaPo or NYT but sometimes I want to see what the opposition is saying and the x thing works on both. Also stops the "We noticed you are using an ad blocker" thing. It does not work on Wall St Journal. What the opinion piece is saying is that if you look at serving sizes, filet mignon is not as bad a deal as it might first seem. Some excerpts: [I]"Unlike some other wildly popular foods I like, nobody is going to say my endorsement of filet mignon (aka tenderloin) is contrarian. Everybody likes filet: That's why filet is so expensive! But I mean it's the best steak for you to make at home. Filet's superior tenderness is why it commands such a high price. But it has other advantages, too. Its tenderness makes it very simple to prepare, because it doesn't need to be tenderized (I'll describe my preferred method below.) Its small cross section makes it simple to portion: Steaks around an inch-and-a-half thick weigh about half a pound, meaning each diner can have a whole steak without getting beef overload. And it's much lower in fat than other premium steaks, like rib eye and strip. And while filet is expensive as beef cuts go, cooking at home is a frugal activity. If you've been cooking at home more, you have room to splurge on ingredients, especially if you get a good value on your meat. You could pay over $30 per pound for beef tenderloin, but lately I've been buying tenderloin steaks from Stop & Shop at $18 per pound, and I've been very satisfied with the quality. At that price, you're paying about $8 per person for a 7-ounce steak — add in some rice or potatoes and a vegetable, and you're way below what it would cost to order takeout..[/I] [HEADING=1][B][I]Go ahead, treat yourself[/I][/B][/HEADING] [I]Filet has a "special occasion" aura, but how special does the occasion really need to be to treat yourself to an $8 piece of meat? Rough day? Busy day? Need to cook at home and want something easy yet indulgent, without too much fat? Have I got the steak for you. It's a filet. "[/I] The writer does pay a bit of dis-service to other steaks, (ribeye/tbones/NYstrip) saying they are too big for fatty for most people, but still, it's a good article that encourages the city consumer to look hard at what they are really getting for their purchase. [I]E[/I]verybody keeps a few taters around, or rice, some canned or fresh frozen veggies so it's only another couple of bucks to finish off a meal. Heck, I go to Whataburger, get a #1 cheeseburger combo (burger/fries and med drink) and I've spent $8 and change. I love my Whataburger, but steak is steak! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Recipes & Cooking
At least they encouraged buying beef
Top