Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Oh no!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="simme" data-source="post: 1704495" data-attributes="member: 40418"><p>Agree. We know that the media does not present the truth. Right? So, we should not judge by what we read in the media. Right?</p><p>Remember that what the jury hears in a trial is focused and limited. The judge may also rule that the jury is not allowed to hear certain information that he or she has deemed not relevant to the charges, even if most people might think it very much is. Presentation sometimes becomes more convincing than the actual facts (sort of like a candidate with the voters). Does that seem fair? The judge's charge to the jury will include that they must decide the case only based on the law and the information presented. In reality, the jurors can decide their verdict on any basis they agree on regardless of the law and the facts. Is that good or bad?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="simme, post: 1704495, member: 40418"] Agree. We know that the media does not present the truth. Right? So, we should not judge by what we read in the media. Right? Remember that what the jury hears in a trial is focused and limited. The judge may also rule that the jury is not allowed to hear certain information that he or she has deemed not relevant to the charges, even if most people might think it very much is. Presentation sometimes becomes more convincing than the actual facts (sort of like a candidate with the voters). Does that seem fair? The judge's charge to the jury will include that they must decide the case only based on the law and the information presented. In reality, the jurors can decide their verdict on any basis they agree on regardless of the law and the facts. Is that good or bad? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Oh no!
Top