Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Another shot dead by Mpls police
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Son of Butch" data-source="post: 1435739" data-attributes="member: 14585"><p>Noor's attorney working with police on perhaps a coverup story to avoid further police embarrassment?</p><p>3 days later and they are now talking about maybe Noor reacted to aerial fireworks a couple of blocks away??</p><p></p><p>audio after shooting has them reporting SHOTS fired, one down... and later, no suspects at large, but never mentioning </p><p>they were the only shooter.</p><p></p><p>It appears at no time before or after the shooting either officer thought the event important enough to turn on their</p><p>body camera. Either that or they did not want any video evidence that might contradict their future statements.</p><p></p><p>It is on camera that in the Mpls police shooting of the 2 dogs, as one officer was explaining what happened, the other officer told him to turn off his body camera. So who knows what was said after that. Remarkable that the written report clearly stated that both dogs charged the officer before he fired, when the video clearly showed that they did not.</p><p></p><p>Unknown to many, but defense attorneys will 'test market' defenses prior to making public their client's defense.</p><p>I know this because years ago I was a paid participant, by a well known group of high priced Minnesota defense attorneys, to listen to their defense presentations and vote as if I were a juror, for them to evaluate which defense story would work best and to learn which types of jurors to select or avoid. It was an eye opener for me as to how much work and expense top defense attorneys put into preparation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Son of Butch, post: 1435739, member: 14585"] Noor's attorney working with police on perhaps a coverup story to avoid further police embarrassment? 3 days later and they are now talking about maybe Noor reacted to aerial fireworks a couple of blocks away?? audio after shooting has them reporting SHOTS fired, one down... and later, no suspects at large, but never mentioning they were the only shooter. It appears at no time before or after the shooting either officer thought the event important enough to turn on their body camera. Either that or they did not want any video evidence that might contradict their future statements. It is on camera that in the Mpls police shooting of the 2 dogs, as one officer was explaining what happened, the other officer told him to turn off his body camera. So who knows what was said after that. Remarkable that the written report clearly stated that both dogs charged the officer before he fired, when the video clearly showed that they did not. Unknown to many, but defense attorneys will 'test market' defenses prior to making public their client's defense. I know this because years ago I was a paid participant, by a well known group of high priced Minnesota defense attorneys, to listen to their defense presentations and vote as if I were a juror, for them to evaluate which defense story would work best and to learn which types of jurors to select or avoid. It was an eye opener for me as to how much work and expense top defense attorneys put into preparation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Another shot dead by Mpls police
Top