SOB - I asked because MARC (US Meat Animal Research Center) research showed "back in 2002". Things have changed. Their research did not include very many breeds. Just thought it was interesting. Especially their statement at the bottom.
http://www.sites.ext.vt.edu/newsletter- ... s-134.html
Sire Breed Means for Preweaning Traitsa
Sire breed of calf Gestation length, d Unassisted calvings, % Birth weight, lb. Survival to wean., % 200-d wean. wt., lb.
Hereford 284 95.6 90.4 96.2 524
Angus 282 99.6 84.0 96.7 533
Red Angus 282 99.1 84.5 96.7 526
Simmental 285 97.7 92.2 96.7 553
Gelbvieh 284 97.8 88.7 97.1 534
Limousin 286 97.6 89.5 96.9 519
Charolais 283 92.8 93.7 97.1 540
LSDb 1.5 3.4 3.1 3.8 14
asource: Cundiff et al., 2001, Germplasm Evaluation Program Progress Report No. 21
bBreed differences that exceed the LSD are significant (P < .05)
Sire Breed Means for Postweaning and Carcass Traits (adjusted to constant age of 448 days)a
Sire calf Post-wn.ADG, lb. Kill wt., lb. Carcass wt, lb. Marb. score, % Choice, % YG Fat Th., in. REA, sq. in.
Hereford 3.46 1363 832 538 79.1 3.35 .55 12.74
Angus 3.40 1375 846 577 93.6 3.32 .58 13.48
Red Angus 3.40 1362 839 589 96.0 3.76 .60 12.21
Simmental 3.47 1390 854 536 61.2 2.95 .42 13.71
Gelbvieh 3.33 1348 826 514 63.0 2.80 .39 13.43
Limousin 3.30 1308 815 507 44.8 2.63 .41 14.02
Charolais 3.43 1370 843 517 75.7 2.77 .43 14.01
LSDb .18 55 33 35 22.5 .41 .11 .75
asource: Cundiff et al., 2001, Germplasm Evaluation Program Progress Report No. 21
bBreed differences that exceed the LSD are significant (P < .05)
"Preliminary results from these breed comparisons indicate that differences between British and Continental breeds are not as great for unassisted calving percentage, weaning weight, postweaning gain, and slaughter weight compared to when the same breeds were evaluated in the 1970�s. British breeds have emphasized selection for growth rate, whereas Continental breeds have emphasized improvement in birth weight and calving ease. Consequently, smaller differences exist between British and Continental breeds for growth rate and calving ease as compared to 25 years ago. However, significant differences exist between British and Continental breeds for marbling and percentage retail product (yield grade). These differences in carcass composition exist despite the increases in growth rate and corresponding carcass weight that have been characterized in the British breeds.
These results confirm that no single breed excels in all economically important traits. A well-designed crossbreeding system that captures the advantages of heterosis and utilizes these breed differences in a complimentary fashion is the most effective genetic resource for an efficient beef production system."