I watched some of the trial and when the prosecutor ask one of the 3 men if they chased Aubry in the pick up he said yes. Then she ask if they hit Aubry twice with the pick up he said yes. When ask why he pulled the gun he stated that he had used this tactic in the past and the person always stopped. When ask why they were chasing him he answered because we thought he was stealing and when we ask him to stop he ran.
If 2 men in a pickup 1 standing in the back with a gun ask you to stop what would you do? If you ran and they chased and hit you with the truck twice what would you do? If they told you stop or I'll kill you what would you do? At what point in this whole scenario did Aubry not have the right to try and defend himself. Who in the hell goes after someone they think is a crook, chases them down with a gun, kills them, and then plays the victim?
I'm 90% sure Aubry was up to no good but this isn't the year 1870 were you can chase people down and kill them because you think they did something. If your tough enough to chase an unarmed man down at least be man enough to fight him fair and square or face the consequences.
If 2 men in a pickup 1 standing in the back with a gun ask you to stop what would you do? If you ran and they chased and hit you with the truck twice what would you do? If they told you stop or I'll kill you what would you do? At what point in this whole scenario did Aubry not have the right to try and defend himself. Who in the hell goes after someone they think is a crook, chases them down with a gun, kills them, and then plays the victim?
I'm 90% sure Aubry was up to no good but this isn't the year 1870 were you can chase people down and kill them because you think they did something. If your tough enough to chase an unarmed man down at least be man enough to fight him fair and square or face the consequences.