Value of Carcass data

Help Support CattleToday:

LFF

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
Location
Madisonville Kentucky
What is good carcass data, and what is it worth?
OCTOBER 02, 2007
By Troy Smith

For some calf-sellers, ignorance is bliss. What happens to their calf crops after the critters are sold is of no concern. Some other cow-calf producers never forget that someone is going to feed their calves. Those producers know performance in the feedlot matters. So does the value of the finished product. Animal performance and carcass merit will determine whether that "someone" wants to feed more calves from certain sources.

All cattle contribute to the reputation of their source. But what kind of reputation is it? Driven by the need to know, more conscientious cow-calf producers are seeking feedlot performance and carcass data on their home-raised calves. Whether they retain ownership or arrange to retrieve the data from subsequent owners, more producers see value in the data.

With the advancement of grid-marketing, where the finished animal's value is subject to the premiums and discounts associated with carcass merit, having carcass data becomes increasingly important. Producers count on good carcass data to tell them where their calves stand, and for directions to where they might need to be. Good data can be a great tool to enhance genetic selection for carcass merit. But what is "good" carcass data, and what is it worth?

According to Scott Greiner, Virginia Tech animal scientist, good carcass data includes measurements of hot carcass weight, ribeye area, external fat, yield grade and, of course, marbling which is the chief determinant of quality grade. Greiner says group data can be useful, but individual data is better.

Group or pen data can give the producer an idea of where, on average, those cattle fit, with regard to industry acceptability, says Greiner. A producer might squeeze more information out of the data by looking at trait distribution, or variation within the group. There will be variation within any group, but it can offer clues to which traits need improvement.

For example, what percentage of the cattle produced carcasses that graded Choice or better, compared to the percentages of Select and Standard? What was the percentage of carcasses achieving Yield Grade 3 or lower, and how many were discounted as Yield Grade 4 and 5? How many were too light, too heavy or near either extreme of carcass weight acceptability? What about the variation in ribeye size?

"To be most useful, any data collected needs to be representative of genetics and management, on a whole-herd basis. And don't jump to conclusions based on one year's data. Use it as a benchmark and see if it's repeatable. After the second or third year, a producer can act on it," cautions Greiner. "But it's hard to evaluate specific sires or cow families with group data. For that, it's best to have data on individual animals of known parentage."

Gathering individual data is the goal of Missouri producers involved in South Ozarks Premier Beef Marketing Group, coordinated by University of Missouri Extension personnel. Comprised primarily of producers with small breeding herds, the group's members have adopted similar pre-weaning management protocols and commingle their calves for backgrounding and marketing purposes. They collectively merchandise five semi-loads of cattle per year, courting buyers willing to provide feedlot and carcass data on individual animals. Some year's they retain part-interest in the calves, by partnering with a feeder.

According to South Ozarks' current president, West Plains producer Al Vance, group data might help lure future bidders, but it's certainly not as effective in implementing genetic improvement. For several years, Vance and fellow participants have used individual carcass data to help direct selection of sires and replacement females. And cows become likely cull candidates, if their calves repeatedly fail to meet the producers' standards for carcass merit.

"Getting carcass data is only half of it. We want to know how the calves feed just as much," states Vance. "Historically, our cattle have fed well – good gains and respectable feed efficiency. We don't intend to lose that. But we want more of them to hit the target of a 750-pound, Yield Grade 2 carcass that grades Choice or better."

When he first started receiving data, Vance admits surprise at how few of his calves graded Choice. And he learned that Choice is worth a lot more than Select on most pricing grids. Consequently, selection for improved marbling became a priority. More recent data shows a 20 percent improvement in the number of Choice carcasses, while maintaining acceptable yield grades and feedlot performance.

"The data can tell you a lot about your herd. The more improvement you need to make, the more the data is worth," says Vance. "For me, personally, I'd say it's been worth about $20 a head."

Scott Greiner notes that how cattle are fed and marketed also matter. It's not all genetics. Cattle must be managed consistently well, harvested at an appropriate end-point and marketed through the same or a similar grid for the data to be most useful. Furthermore, uniform collection of data contributes to its quality and value.

Retrieving data after selling calves isn't always easy, Greiner warns. It's generally much easier when producers retained ownership. Still, he calls the availability of carcass data dramatically improved. That's not to say it's free. In Greiner's experience with Virginia Tech's retained ownership program, the cost of complete data runs in the neighborhood of $8 per head. The cost to South Ozarks producers is similar.

"What it is worth to an individual producer will vary. It's different for everyone, depending on how they use it," Greiner says. "However, the difference in grid-value between the top end and the bottom end of a set of finished steers is about $200 per head. Year-in and year-out, when you take out all of the variables, it's still about $200. It takes time, obviously, but if a producer can add $100 per head to the bottom-end steers (through improved carcass merit) it makes the $8 cost look cheap."

"Of course," he adds, "carcass data isn't worth anything if you don't use it."
 
A look at the rate carcass values can change
By Fred Knop (6/10/2004)

As value-based marketing continues its fast growth and more and more commercial producers face the need to correct carcass deficiencies in their cattle, the question is often less about how to and more about how fast.

It was this question that drew my attention to a report in this year's sale catalog of Gardiner Angus Ranch, a highly respected seedstock operation at Ashland, Kan. The Gardiner family does a lot of research on their herd, which they often share with their customers. Although this year's report was undoubtedly intended to promote the carcass genetics of their sale bulls, it, in addition, provided some interesting insight into the how fast question.

The Gardiner data, as shown in the accompanying chart, shows impressive changes were created in intramuscular fat and ribeye area of fall-born, long-yearling bulls during a relatively short, three-year period — 2000 to 2002. Think about it. Moving intramuscular fat percentages from 3.93 to 5.51 is a 40-percent increase. Moving adjusted ribeye area from 12.6 to 13.6 square inches is an 8-percent increase. Moving up the EPDs for intramuscular fat and ribeye area are increases of 30 percent and 50 percent, respectively.

I could write a column or more on the importance of each of these traits. But consider just these two points. First, as the percentage of intramuscular fat moves up from about 3 percent to about 9 percent, the meat of your animals moves closer to or into the lucrative Prime grade and your chances increase for collecting a lot of Prime grade premiums on the grid.

Second, you've done nothing but help yourself when you breed large ribeyes into moderately sized cattle, as the Gardiners have done. Ribeye size in relationship to carcass weight is an indicator of muscularity and a factor in calculating dressing percentage, yield grade and retail yield. These are factors that either pay off on the grid or in the live-weight bids of packer buyers.

It is tempting to plunge right into the how to aspect of these changes, but remember the focus here is on the how fast aspect. What is important from the standpoint of your breeding plan is that the Gardiner experience provides an example of how significant change can be affected in a relatively short time. How close you can come to what the Gardiner family did in only three years depends on a lot of things — your genetic starting point, your records orientation, your willingness to make changes, your willingness to invest in genetics, your willingness to track results.

Instead of jumping into the how to aspect, let's do a how to fast. You have many of the same tools with which to work, as did the Gardiner family. The Gardiners believe ultrasound data collection, which was adopted by the American Angus Association in 1998, contributed greatly to their results by making it possible to reliably consider and use many more sires. Via semen selection, you have access to this same caliber of bulls in your breed if you breed artificially. You have a similar opportunity if you breed naturally, provided you don't get committed to individual bulls for too long.

You probably won't find it possible to duplicate the Gardiner program on the female side, particularly if you have a commercial operation. About 75 percent of Gardiner calves are produced from embryos transferred from elite cows. But almost all of you can create a more potent cow base through deep, records-oriented culling. Don't be guilty of the error being committed by most producers — trying to do too much through sire selection and not enough through your cows.

It goes without saying that it takes time to affect genetic change. I hope that the example given in this column will serve as a reminder that a lot can be accomplished in a relatively short time if the task is approached with serious intention.

To contact Fred Knop, write Drovers or send e-mail to [email protected]
 

Latest posts

Top