Does any one know of a bull of that has yearling ultrasound data of:
imf 5% or better
rea 1.3 sq.in. /cwt
b.f. <.3
yearling weight 1200# or greater
Any breed but must be purebred
What size ribeye per cwt did he have. You have earned some bragging rights with a imf like that and bf less that .2 It usually takes atleast .2 bf for an animal to express his full genetic potential in regards to imf.greatgerts":3jrev0e2 said:I sold a bull to a commercial breeder that was 4.9 IMF, .14 back fat and was 1025 at 12 months. That is the closest I have had. I will look up some bulls for you if you want.
certherfbeef":pmhqpr6v said:Does any one know of a bull of that has yearling ultrasound data of:
imf 5% or better
rea 1.3 sq.in. /cwt
b.f. <.3
yearling weight 1200# or greater
Any breed but must be purebred
Ollie, the back fat <.3 isn't back fat based on the condition that the animal carries? Then back fat would only be based on management and environment.
And how can it be used to compare animals if it is only a measure of the condition an animal carries? Or is it a mearsure of an animal's fleshing ability?
Please help me understand some of this. ~Missi
ollie":wxzt0bgf said:Frankie , Your all talk . Back up your claims. I didn't put up the post to discuss epd's . If you have information related to carcas data then post the bulls name . Talk about epd's on a different post. You don't know what your talking about and are missleading people .
ollie":2v3wy8z5 said:Hello dun , do you know of a bull that meets the criteria. If not please go to the sniping page.
ollie":3u9nrriu said:Frankie , Your all talk . Back up your claims. I didn't put up the post to discuss epd's . If you have information related to carcas data then post the bulls name . Talk about epd's on a different post. You don't know what your talking about and are missleading people .
ollie":3532x1sf said:Does any one know of a bull of that has yearling ultrasound data of:
imf 5% or better
rea 1.3 sq.in. /cwt or bigger
b.f. <.3
yearling weight 1200# or greater
Any breed but must be purebred
greatgerts wrote:
I sold a bull to a commercial breeder that was 4.9 IMF, .14 back fat and was 1025 at 12 months. That is the closest I have had. I will look up some bulls for you if you want.
What size ribeye per cwt did he have. You have earned some bragging rights with a imf like that and bf less that .2 It usually takes atleast .2 bf for an animal to express his full genetic potential in regards to imf.