So far we haven't had a "sensible" third choice for president. Just one "sensible" First Choice.PATB":1cdv97ae said:The Iraqis had weapons of mass destruction because we gave it to them to use on the Iranians. I do beleive this happened in the reagan/bush era. Kerry has a right to his views on Veitnam since he served 2 tours there. The US would be better off with a sensible 3rd choice for president who was not a member of the Skull and Cross bones club at harvard. The government is not doing enuff to support our troop families home and abroad. It was bad when I did my 2 hitches in the Air Force an has only gone down hill since. The last comment I have to make is that we only hear what our media wants us to hear and when they want us to hear it. How much of your TV news taken up by what happen on reality shows instead of what is happening in the world?
WIN BUSH WIN