Jeanne,
Everyone on here, except you JS, know that when I refer to "MY" Simmentals, I am NOT referring to the fact that I own the whole breed.
Good to hear.
I am very proud of MY breed, and MY cattle, but I do not think in any way shape or form, that MY breed is the only good breed out there and that every cattleman should be using Simmental.
This is true, Simmental won't work well for every breed, I never said they would.
Time for you to "get real".
You bash my operation, without having a clue how I run my business. And, yes, it is run as a business. My cows have to pay for themselves.
I didn't bash your operation; I said you were out of touch with the production cow unit. I also voiced my opinion on what you said about cattle from the south and west; and about your forage base being too good for 1300 lb cows. That was just silly.
I just sold 4 c/c pairs & 2 fall bred heifers (six head - 3 cows never had a halter on them) for more money than you probably could sell 20 head for. And, "SOME" of my cattle get shown (and do a pretty fancy job of winning) but ALL MY COWS make a living out in the pasture - on grass & hay - no grain.
Good for you. Like I said before, I haven't seen many show ponies that could make it in a production cow unit. In the Purebred business – performance is number 1.
You managed to look up my bulls EPD's - and no, he doesn't have good growth numbers, but he is a trait leader in Calving Ease & Birth Weight, and his offspring have topped bull tests and feedlot tests (not just on gain, but most profitable steers).
Two traits out of 14 isn't that wonderful and 0 traits related to the production of meat.
Yeah I did look up your bull – what you have to ask yourself is--- if that bull wasn't yours would you consider using him for your production unit??????
Most people would say no for the following reasons:
Vastly below average for growth at WW or YW
Vastly below average for all carcass traits: CW, IMF, REA, BF, YG.
API is pretty weak in today's numbers (118)
TI is awful (53)
What I would like to see in more Simmental breeders is a real interest in trying to promote and raise better than average breeding stock. Isn't this our real purpose??
This is one of the reasons I say "you are out of touch with the production cow unit". The show stuff has nothing to do with the production of meat.
90% of the bulls we raise (Simmental breeders) will go to production cow units or commercial cattle operations. The last thing we want to do is sell bulls that are below average for the breed--- as this doesn't help them in any way.
I believe that all those cows/bulls that are below the national average should be culled as they do not represent quality of breed. I just don't believe it is good for business to be dumping culls on commercial cattlemen. This behaviour will someday come back to bite us all in the butt.
So that others will know what average for PB Simmental is:
CE: 7.0; BW: 0.9; WW: 32; YW: 58; MCE: 3.0; MM: 3.8; MWW: 19.9; Stay: 18; CW -1.5; YG: 0.00; Marb: 0.15; BF: 0.02; REA: 0.10; SHR:-0.30; API: 106; TI: 63
I haven't ever sold below average cattle to a buyer. In fact, our cull point is any animal below average for any trait of economic importance including API and TI below 120/70. Not everyone does this and that is ok, but my interests are focused on providing the best quality bulls I possibly can to any breeder whether commercial or PB.
I am also against selling below average PB Simmental cattle in a sale. Many Simmental sales tend to be a dumping ground for inferior cattle and this is very sad to me. Taking advantage of a buyer at an ASA Sponsored sale is as low as you can get.
I recently pulled a few cows out of a Sale for this very reason. After looking over the offerings, from other breeders, we decided it would not be in our best interest to be part of a sale that had below average cattle in the line-up. The only thing we can do is distance ourselves from these types of people.
The people that managed the sale called us and asked us why we pulled our cattle from the sale and we told them this very thing. Selling culls to my neighbour's is just not my cup of tea.
As PB breeders it is also our job to inform and educate potential buyers about our breed of cattle and what is considered the norm and what we as an association consider below average.
At the very least if a breeder has below average cattle they should be sold after the above average cattle have been sold, so that buyers don't un-intentionally buy these inferior cattle thinking they were the norm. Some of our fellow breeders need to dig deep and see if they can find some integrity for the future well-being of Simmental cattle.
You want to talk NET PROFIT per cow unit????
Yeah I do, because you are out of touch with the production cow unit.
See – you are trying to compare Apples to Oranges – you cannot do that. If you are comparing Apples – you must use apples.
The everyday production unit isn't buying $6000 cows and heifers. PB breeders will and some Commercial do, as well, but it is not the norm.
With the understanding that 90% of our bulls are going to production units, we should be catering to them and their needs. 30 years of doing Bull tests this is what they said they want:
Good calving ease / birth weights
Good growth at weaning and yearling, which is above the average
Moderate frames 5.5 – 6.2
Moderate Milk Production in Simm that means 5
Good carcass merits YG, IMF, REA, CW, BF; above average as well
Like I said I just wish that more breeders of Simmental cattle would at least try to produce the best cattle they can and stop the madness in offering culls at sponsored sales.
It's hard to load those girls up and take them to the yard, but it is best in the long run --- and we are here for the long run. Just today, I sent a PB Red Simmental cow to the yard, API 127 TI 76, because she has a disposition problem—Wednesday night she will enter the hamburger production unit at the packing house—if they aren't right – you have to move them---period.
As far as production cow units –those larger frame cows you are talking about don't make as much money—all things considered = as a more moderately framed, moderately milking individual, due in most part to maintenance costs.
This is simple math; It is how many pounds of beef produced annually that pays the bills and not about how many 1600 lb hay burners you can run on your awesome forage base.
Let me give you a short example:
If you have 100 acres of pasture and your total production of forage is 700K lbs per growing season (6 months) how many 1600 lb cows can you run?
80 cows weighing 1600 lbs.
100 cows weighing 1300 lbs.
Over winter you will lose big time feeding those 1600 lb cows—no contest.
Say you have to feed hay for 150 days, that is 380 (1500 lb bales) at $50/roll
380 x 50 = $19,200.
80 calves wean at 600 lbs from those 1600 lb cows.
Using the Market report (there is not one for NY, so will use PA) $1.15/ lb
600 x 80 x $1.15 = $55.200 (minus hay costs, which = maintenance costs) 55,200 – 19,200 = $36,000.
These type of cattle regardless of breed are a loser –for a Production Unit.
100 calves wean at 550 lbs from those 1300 lb cows.
Using the Market report (using PA, again) $1.11/ lb
550 x 100 x $1.11= $61,050
Hay costs = 19,500
$61,050 – $19,500 = $41,500
80 x 600 = 48,000 lbs produced
100 x 550 = 55,000 lbs produced.
Now this all goes back to the Bulls; you as a Simmental breeder offer the Production cow unit.
Are the Bulls you are offering going to improve the pounds of live weight produced on an annual basis for the production cow unit?
Will they produce good carcasses as they move through the production chain?
Breeding below average bulls to average or below average cows produce below average calves.
One last note:
According to the 2005 National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA): a new benchmark for the U.S. beef industry identified the following 10 goals to help American beef remain the best in the world:
1. To encourage the production of cattle and carcasses and to meet industry targets.
2. Expedite communication among all segments of the beef supply chain.
3. Move toward source and age verification to build quality supply lines of cattle.
4. Minimize the production of excess fat.
5. Strive for uniform and consistent in all phases of cattle production.
6. Consider tenderness scores in genetic and management decisions.
7. Recognize that increased marbling is a value-determining trait.
8. Learn to better assess cattle based on genetic merits.
9. Selection of management practices that increase value.
10. Recognize the importance and mindset of quality lbs vs. quantity lbs.
Are you trying to do your part?
I am.
JS