Pool Your Calves!!!!!!!

Help Support CattleToday:

MikeC

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
7,636
Reaction score
3
Location
Alabama
The Positives of Pooling

By Alaina Burt Managing editor

Jan 1, 2007 12:00 PM


Kentucky is the largest cow-calf producing state east of the Mississippi River. Despite boasting 1.1 million beef cows, Kentucky's average herd size is just 29 head. As a result, calves typically sell in smaller groups.


But the 13 members of the Barren Beef Group have given up their independence for the bigger payouts that come with pooling their calves to build bigger, more uniform lots.

"It's just makes financial sense," says Robert Wilcoxson, group member and feeder for the group. "Even with 170 head of cows, I can't put uniform groups together like I can through this program."

Wilcoxson, of Center, KY, says, on average, he's seeing a 5-7¢ premium/lb. on his pooled calves compared to calves traditionally marketed to the nearest sale barn.

Aside from making money, there are plenty of other benefits in huddling up production, he adds. Members can access better genetics and improved breeding programs, or benefit from nutrition consultation. Other members cite the sharing of information between new operators and their more experienced counterparts via the program.

The pooling program began when Park City neighbors Jerry Greer and Richard Brown, with only 30-40 cows each, decided to combine their calves. They sorted them by sex; Greer fed the heifers, and Brown the steers.

"We discovered we weren't doing any good because we didn't have enough cattle to make a uniform, truckload lot of either steers or heifers," Greer says.

So the pair began talking to neighbors they considered "progressive" in hopes of forming a larger cooperative marketing program.

As it turned out, finding progressive cattle producers wasn't too hard. Over the course of nine years, two men pooling 75 calves has evolved into 13 producers pooling 650 calves annually. The result is the cohesive Barren Beef Group.

Cooperative marketing


Members meet several times annually. But around marketing time, the group gets together at a local steakhouse to devise marketing plans. Cattle are fed to gain roughly 2-2.5 lbs./day, enabling the group to determine marketing dates when cattle reach a target weight of 700-750 lbs.

"We sell the calves 40-60 days ahead of time, knowing we'll hit that target weight at delivery date," says Greg Ritter, a producer from Glasgow, KY, who has 75 head of mother cows. He's also president of the Kentucky Cattlemen's Association.

For the past three years, the majority of Barren Beef Group calves have been forward-contracted through Internet sales at the Bluegrass Stockyards in Lexington, KY.

"If we don't like the way they sell, we can reject that sale and put them on another sale for immediate, or 30-day, delivery," Ritter cites. He says one of the challenges of working with a group can be getting everyone on the same page for marketing.

Jim Gibson, Internet and CPH45 coordinator for Bluegrass Stockyards compares selling over the Internet like buying an insurance policy. "It spreads the risk between you and the buyer," he says.

In six years, Bluegrass Stockyards has marketed more than 150,000 head through Internet sales, Gibson says. Cattle selling over the Internet generally bring a $1- to $2-premium, depending on the market.

Each co-op member owns his own cattle all the way through the program, "until he gets paid," Ritter explains.

"The result is top market price with premiums for truckload commingled source- and age-verified Angus and Angus-cross feeders," says Roger Williamson, a group member with a 115-head cowherd.

For example, take two similar groups of heifers the Barren Beef Group video-marketed last year. The process-verified program cattle brought $3/cwt. more than the non-program heifers. Multiplied by the truckload, "it was enough to buy groceries for a while," Ritter says.

It starts at the beginning


The Barren Beef Group cooperative effort begins well before the first calf hits the ground. Cattle genetics are standardized; members even utilize a single source for bulls.

The genetic focus is growth traits coupled with carcass traits ribeye area, muscling and intramuscular fat, with Angus bulls relied on to achieve those traits.

Aside from shared genetics, members operate from a synchronized calendar to create a uniform calf crop. This includes everything from a shared breeding season to weaning and commingling dates.

"We're all on the exact same vaccination program," says Larry Watson, Bowling Green, KY, who brings his nutritionist background to the table, along with 85 head of cattle. All the Barren Beef Group's cattle are on Merial's SureHealth® vaccination program, which gives buyers a 21-day guarantee that purchased calves will remain healthy.

The Barren Beef Group collaboration also brings its members purchasing power for animal health products, feed and nutritional supplements and semen.

For instance, by ordering mineral in bulk, members save $2/50-lb. bag with two-ton minimum deliveries. Meanwhile, feed prices are contracted by bid, shaving $8- $10/ton.

All for one


The Barren Beef Group has no hierarchy; all have an equal say. Each producer brings his own strengths and ideas to the table.

"If we're interested in something, we just bring it up," explains Charles Dale Embry, a former tobacco farmer from Cave City, KY, who reinvested his time into 64 head of beef cattle.

Last year, Watson broached the idea of testing cattle persistently infected (PI) with bovine viral diarrhea. At the time, it met with a big yawn from other members, but he continued to stress the importance of PI testing.

"PI became a concern when a lot of experts started talking about it at NCBA last year," explains Monica Porter, sales rep for Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, which also works with the Barren Beef Group on herd health.

To help answer the group's questions, Porter brought in a veterinarian and a PI specialist. After hearing different viewpoints about PI testing, the group reassessed the situation and decided to PI-test all calves in spring 2007.

"PI will be one of the next hot topics, hot buttons, in the industry," Ritter says.

Pooling together


As the calendar dictates, members wean their calves within a week of each other, collect weight, color, age, sex and ID/tag numbers, and submit that data to group member Roger Williamson. An EID tag and a color-specific visual tag identify each producer's calves.

It's up to individuals to provide supplemental calf data, such as dam and sire information, birth weight, and birth and weaning dates. Williamson, who compiles the data during the 30-day preconditioning period, sorts the cattle into 70-head lots based on sex, color and weight before assigning them to a feeder.

"None of us could do this on our own, as it requires 600-700 calves to sort uniformly," Williamson says.

After looking at the pooled calves, Porter recalls how impressed she was. "You could put a ruler across their backs, they were that uniform," she says.

"We've gotten to where our cattle are good enough, and alike enough, that we can really do it on the computer and 99.9% of them will match," Greer says. Before computer technology was used, cattle were combined and visually sorted.

With computer database management, it's easy to see which calves rise to the top. This creates a natural environment for competition among members of the Barren Beef Group.

"Everybody wants to have the better calves," acknowledges Wilcoxson.

Embry says he's seen significant progress in his calves. After only four years of Barren Beef Group involvement, he says his cattle have climbed significantly in performance. His last set of calves averaged 656 lbs. at weaning.

After 30 days of preconditioning, a commingle date is set where calves are hauled to eight different feeding locations. The goal is to put together uniform truckload-lots of 70 head weighing just under 50,000 lbs. after 45 days of commingling.

On commingling day, group members work from dusk to dawn between operations to get 650 head settled into their new feeding locations. But that's not the only time members work together.

"Anytime I go to work cattle, I call on these people rather than hire help," Greer says. "And they do the same if they need help."

In fact, seven years ago, Greer suffered a heart attack. Group members, however, worked his calves on schedule. Similar health issues have waylaid other members recently, but everyone pitches in.

"They are true friends and cattlemen," Williamson says.
 
Frankie, If you weren't so colorblind you would find a much bigger picture in the article. :lol:

Pooling calves is becoming a larger and larger segment in which the feeder calf producer can make a bigger impact on his bottom line.

There are too many advantages to list.

This might be the salvation of the small producer, if they would just stick together.

I saw ALL the small dairies go out of business here in the 1970's because they could not agree with each other. I would hate to see the beef industry go that way.
 
MikeC":3micnms9 said:
Frankie, If you weren't so colorblind you would find a much bigger picture in the article. :lol:

Pooling calves is becoming a larger and larger segment in which the feeder calf producer can make a bigger impact on his bottom line.

There are too many advantages to list.

This might be the salvation of the small producer, if they would just stick together.

I saw ALL the small dairies go out of business here in the 1970's because they could not agree with each other. I would hate to see the beef industry go that way.

I do see the advantages of pooling cattle. The Angus Journal has had article after article, encouraging producers to do it and success stories of groups that have. But who wants to hear what the Journal has to say? :roll: But when YOU post an article that says this successful group has turned to Angus bulls, I just thought it should be highlighted. :D

For those producers who aren't interested in pooling their calves, most states have some sort of retained ownership program. I'd encourage everyone to send a few through. Believe me when I say it's a learning experience.
 
But who wants to hear what the Journal has to say?

I think it was you that used the term "breed propaganda" a while back referring to an article I posted. Come to find out it was research by OK State. :lol:

Some people see the "Journal" as just that. Breed propaganda.
 
MikeC":1p70okpk said:
But who wants to hear what the Journal has to say?

I think it was you that used the term "breed propaganda" a while back referring to an article I posted. Come to find out it was research by OK State. :lol:

Some people see the "Journal" as just that. Breed propaganda.

Some people see any breed magazine as propaganda. That's why I don't post many articles from the Journal. I was glad to post the link to your article and highlight that it was a positive for Angus. I'm sure no one on this board would think you were promoting Angus propaganda. :D
 
No matter what breed they use. It was interesting article on small operators getting together to become more profitable also a feel good story of Cattleman working together to help one another.
 
Top