Tman":5f036fjj said:
Gale,
I like to think I am open minded and have looked into this breed. Looks very appealing and yet I feel the same marketing constraints, ie. the consumer. After reviewing the website and a few others I have a couple of questions. How do you deal with the downside of Myostatin expression.
Underdeveloped reproductive traits
Macroglossia
Weak bones
Small pelvic bones (Calving)
Poor lactaction
Reduction in collagen resulting in poor liver and poor hide which leads to higher infections and increased susceptiblity to heat stress.
increased gestation (Have you experienced this?)
Lower growth rates. (Not talking about doublemuscling affect)
Do you have to take extra precautions for these factors or could they roam the great southwest ?
I suppose if you could overcome the marketability issue dealing with the above might be a small price to pay for the payoff. I wonder if going for higher qaulity on a smaller cow would not be the way to go though.
Please register, we appreciate your thoughts and look forward to hearing from you more.
i will address 1st lower growth rates i find that nothing could be further from the truth with my fullblood herd.
april 1st 2004 iweaned 9 calves 5 bulls 4 heifers.
the weights were as follows.
july 9th 2003 bull calf 800 lbs
mid august bull calf 820 lbs
three sept bull calves 771 lbs 622 lbs 587 lbs
4 september heifers 735 lbs 702 lbs 624 lbs 603 lbs
these calves have been on nothing but grass since april 1st 2004
one bull was at ohio state for 21 days in october 2003 he gained 59 lbs in 21 days on mamas milk
now macrogloissia large tounge i know of no deformities in our breed however there are incidents like in all breeds where a bull calf might have some swelling of the tounge for a few days from being a bull which has a larger head than a heifer but no substained problems.