Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Philando Castillo - settlement reached
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Son of Butch" data-source="post: 1428703" data-attributes="member: 14585"><p>A good, fair and honest question.</p><p></p><p>Employers are liable for negligent acts or omissions by their employees when an employee is carrying out duties</p><p>authorized by the employer within the scope of their employment.</p><p>It falls under the common law principle of.... One (employer) who acts through another (employee) is acting in </p><p>their own (employer's) interests.</p><p></p><p>Liability ends when employee is performing a duty unrelated to the scope of their employment.</p><p></p><p>Example: the officer operates a lemonade stand on his day off... and shoots a customer for stealing a glass from his </p><p>lemonade stand... then his employer has no liability as the employee was performing duties in his own interests on his</p><p>own time and outside of the scope of his authorized employment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Son of Butch, post: 1428703, member: 14585"] A good, fair and honest question. Employers are liable for negligent acts or omissions by their employees when an employee is carrying out duties authorized by the employer within the scope of their employment. It falls under the common law principle of.... One (employer) who acts through another (employee) is acting in their own (employer's) interests. Liability ends when employee is performing a duty unrelated to the scope of their employment. Example: the officer operates a lemonade stand on his day off... and shoots a customer for stealing a glass from his lemonade stand... then his employer has no liability as the employee was performing duties in his own interests on his own time and outside of the scope of his authorized employment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Philando Castillo - settlement reached
Top