Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
Percentages
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frankie" data-source="post: 635826" data-attributes="member: 13"><p>You're right. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite10" alt=":oops:" title="Oops! :oops:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":oops:" /> What that calculator shows is that they have 35.82% of the same genes. It doesn't help at all in the blood relationship. I plugged in registration numbers for a pair of full siblings and got 52% because they have some linebreeding in their background.</p><p></p><p>I think you're probably right. Can you, please, show us how you came up with the 93.75?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frankie, post: 635826, member: 13"] You're right. :oops: What that calculator shows is that they have 35.82% of the same genes. It doesn't help at all in the blood relationship. I plugged in registration numbers for a pair of full siblings and got 52% because they have some linebreeding in their background. I think you're probably right. Can you, please, show us how you came up with the 93.75? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Every Thing Else Board
Percentages
Top