Caustic Burno":j8j01iri said:
I believe I have read you are 25 or 26 and you post an amazing amount of expertise in such a short life on so many subjects.
I'm 28, and I never claimed to be an expert.. Like old Bob Dylan said, "you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows."
I pay attention, and I choose to look at and learn about all kinds of things that the average person chooses to ignore. That doesn't make me a weatherman per se, but it helps me seperate fact from fiction when I hear one telling me what's headed my way.
Caustic Burno":j8j01iri said:
I play quite a bit in a pasture that deals with commodity markets. Supply and demand has everthing to do with commodities no matter what the dollar value is. Supply is low demand high (price is high) Supply is long demand is down (price is low ) that is commodities 101.
Agreed, except to say that it's not only commodities 101 -- it's economics 101..
Caustic Burno":j8j01iri said:
I trade in oil futures the only thing that will bring oil prices down is reduction by the consumer increasing supply....
Agreed again.
Caustic Burno":j8j01iri said:
....or increased supply by refining.
Here's where I disagree..
There are two supply/demand markets at work where crude oil and petroleum products are concerned -- not just one.
In the first market, the crude oil producers are dependent on refineries to consume the oil..
In the second market, the refineries are dependent on automobile drivers, factories, etc to consume the gasoline and other refined products..
If we were reduced to one refinery, the consumer price of the *refined* products (i.e., gasoline) would skyrocket... I think we can agree on that much..
However, that only accounts for the second market..
In the first market, a *decrease* in the capacity of consumers (refineries) would lead to a *surplus* in supply (crude), if production remained steady.. If it came down to, say, two refineries and crude production remained steady, those two refineries would only have to compete against one another for millions upon millions of barrels of crude, and the price would come WAAAY down...
Conversely, if there was *more* refinery capacity than there was crude, the price of crude would go up as a result of heavy consumer (refinery) competition..
I'm honestly not trying to sound like a prick here, but it's really a pretty simple concept..
Caustic Burno":j8j01iri said:
Oil price's will fall due to inflation and the consumer haveing fewer spenable dollars to buy products increasing supply.
That depends on *who* is going through the inflation.. If you're talking about US inflation, I totally disagree.. If you're talking about global inflation...well...I still disagree, but less vehemently. :lol:
The US uses about 25% of the world's oil, but China and India are using more every day. If the US saw inflation go to 100% overnight, that would -- by definition -- mean that everything would cost twice as much the next day.. If oil were $70US/bbl the day before, it would be $140US the next day.. If half the US population could no longer afford to use oil, the *world* would see a 12.5% reduction in consumption..
Point is, if it comes down as a result of lowered US consumption, it won't come down much thanks to heavy Chinese and Indian consumption..
In fact, I just don't think that *any* commodity in short supply (oil, gold, silver, copper, nickel, aluminum, steel, etc.) with strong and ever growing global demand will drop very much as a result of isolated US inflation...
But boy if you had a pocketful of each before it happened......... ;-)