Travlr
Well-known member
Back east short cattle can live well on acres covered in lush grass... and out west where a cow has to cover ground to find enough to eat they need some legs. This means we have two competing types and buyers/producers are always inclined to go one way or the other due to current popularity rather than actual, functional profits from boxed beef.I think as far as breeds being where they should be size wise is close, but some have gone too far and are too short. Herefords, polled in particular are too focused on the show ring, and have a lot of what some folks call toads, and what would be called shorts around here. Some Angus are headed that way too.
I believe that the push for more marbling has more to do with marketing than anything else.
The bar has to continue to change to keep some breeders ahead of pack.
I say that because if they keep pursuing more marbling they will turn the phenotype into dairy or wagyu types and that won't be as efficient in carcass yield or especially cost per pound of gain that they have traditionally excelled in.
This is why the CBA program, regardless of actual quality in cattle, has been a financially brilliant and genetically destructive marketing campaign.
The same thing is going on with muscle/marbling and demand will fluctuate over time just as anything else does.
Producers are left chasing whatever trend is most popular. Some will excel because they can anticipate where the market is going... and some will be trying to catch up as the market is changing to something else, always playing catch-up.
Would we all benefit by finding a market for what we presently produce and them staying consistent in what they want, marketing what they get rather than following trends which demand constant change? I tend to think so...
But it isn't realistic to expect that.