- 36,528

- 27,863

- 135

##### My favorite teams

There are 82 games in an NBA season. To go .500 for the season, a team needs a 41-41 record. If a team is 43-17, would you say they are 26 or 2 games above .500?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Gustavus Adolphus
- Start date

- 36,528

- 27,863

- 135

There are 82 games in an NBA season. To go .500 for the season, a team needs a 41-41 record. If a team is 43-17, would you say they are 26 or 2 games above .500?

- 43,507

- 39,516

- 135

2 games above .500

There are 82 games in an NBA season. To go .500 for the season, a team needs a 41-41 record. If a team is 43-17, would you say they are 26 or 2 games above .500?

- 8,809

- 5,303

- 70

Not 2

- 21,990

- 6,904

- 105

- 36,528

- 27,863

- 135

So then wouldn't it be 13 games? In my example 43 + 17 = 60. 60/2 = 30. 43 - 30 = 13 games above .500current loss recordand how many more wins the team is above that.

- 21,990

- 6,904

- 105

That's a fair point. I suppose it depends on where your baseline for .500 is. If it is based on the total games played to that point, regardless of wins or losses, then your answer is correct. In the case of the NBA at the end of the season 41 losses = .500 so whatever you are above or below that is what it is.So then wouldn't it be 13 games? In my example 43 + 17 = 60. 60/2 = 30. 43 - 30 = 13 games above .500

Not sure why, for cases during the middle of the season I've always used the loss column as my baseline. So if a team is 6-4, I consider them 2 games above .500. With your logic they would only be 1 game above .500. And I suppose if you're using 41 total losses to be .500 as the baseline, they're still idk 35 games below .500 or something

I've never thought quite so hard about this thing before lol

- 36,528

- 27,863

- 135

Could be worse, we could be talking about Justin Fields.That's a fair point. I suppose it depends on where your baseline for .500 is. If it is based on the total games played to that point, regardless of wins or losses, then your answer is correct. In the case of the NBA at the end of the season 41 losses = .500 so whatever you are above or below that is what it is.

Not sure why, for cases during the middle of the season I've always used the loss column as my baseline. So if a team is 6-4, I consider them 2 games above .500. With your logic they would only be 1 game above .500. And I suppose if you're using 41 total losses to be .500 as the baseline, they're still idk 35 games below .500 or something

I've never thought quite so hard about this thing before lol

- 1,583

- 749

- 70

So then wouldn't it be 13 games? In my example 43 + 17 = 60. 60/2 = 30. 43 - 30 = 13 games above .500

Also you gave us 2 options then dropped in the 13 option haha.

I would agree with the 13 option tho.

- 36,528

- 27,863

- 135

Cant look into the future imo. what if they don't end up playing every game of the season.

Looks like there’s four options.

- 21,990

- 6,904

- 105

But which option is the true option...Looks like there’s four options.

- 13,724

- 6,561

- 75

But since this hypothetical team has won 71.66% of their games, at that rate, they would win 58.7 games in a 82 game season. Let's round that to 59 games, which would put them at 18 games above .500.

- 19,988

- 6,734

- 85

How many games would they have to lose in a row to be .500?

There are 82 games in an NBA season. To go .500 for the season, a team needs a 41-41 record. If a team is 43-17, would you say they are 26 or 2 games above .500?

You can do the math.

All your hypothetical questions and input don't mean anything.

Games above .500 is an actual number and always has a finite answer.

Clarify your question.

How many games above .500 will X be this year at this point?

Or is the question.... how many games above .500 is x?

There is no argument, debate, or wiggle. If this is what you debate about with friends...drink more or drink less or get new friendX?

It's used like 26. You would have to lose 26 games to be .500.

You could make an argument for 13....the number of games outcomes you must change...but not 2.

I like Games won-.5(games played)=13

Last edited:

- 36,528

- 27,863

- 135

Please put me on ignore.How many games would they have to lose in a row to be .500?

You can do the math.

All your hypothetical questions and input don't mean anything.

Games above .500 is an actual number and always has a finite answer.

Clarify your question.

How many games above .500 will X be this year at this point?

Or is the question.... how many games above .500 is x?

There is no argument, debate, or wiggle. If this is what you debate about with friends...drink more or drink less or get new friendX?

It's used like 26. You would have to lose 26 games to be .500.

You could make an argument for 13....the number of games outcomes you must change...but not 2.

- 19,988

- 6,734

- 85

Only soppy pussies have to put people on ignore. It takes a whole new level of Karen"ness" to think someone else should manage your soppy pussies feelings for you.Please put me on ignore.

- 16,384

- 12,379

- 85

What is happening in here

- 19,988

- 6,734

- 85

Some white bitch is mad cuz she can’t do math or settle a ridiculous bet with her friend.What is happening in here

- 16,384

- 12,379

- 85

There are women here?Some white bitch is mad cuz she can’t do math or settle a ridiculous bet with her friend.

- 36,528

- 27,863

- 135

EverywhereThere are women here?

- 16,384

- 12,379

- 85

My wife's not gonna like this I may have ta quit posting here now. she is convinced the interwebs is filled with man stealing thots and I simply become brain dead at the first sign of tittays and they can overpower my branes and steal meEverywhere

- 9,839members

- 83,824threads

- 3,804,047posts

- 174online users