Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
More on Fawn Calf Syndrome
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frankie" data-source="post: 659169" data-attributes="member: 13"><p>Sure, DOC. I'll post a link to the first thread that I remember robert posting in.</p><p></p><p> As you can see, I attached a link to Wehrmann's statement on how they planned to handle Curley Calf (AM). robert jumped in and claimed they said "<em>they produced that only 1 out of 28 they retained is positive for AM? Doesn't anyone else have the least concern that the herd that bred and owned 9J9, 5H11, 8E8, 1B2, along with the addition of 2536, 1680 and Future Direction genetics has managed to retain only AM free daughters</em>?"</p><p></p><p>Of course, there was nothing like that in the statement. And I wasn't the only poster to point that out to robert. IMO, he's a gossip and for the most part I ignore him, thinking that most people on the board understand that. But we do have new people joining pretty regular, so I think occasionally I'll call his hand.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://cattletoday.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=53909&p=619068&hilit=wehrmann+statement#p619068" target="_blank">viewtopic.php?f=5&t=53909&p=619068&hilit=wehrmann+statement#p619068</a></p><p></p><p>For what it's worth, I think gossips rank at the bottom end of the human race. Gossip and innuendo can do a lot of damage to individuals and breeding programs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frankie, post: 659169, member: 13"] Sure, DOC. I'll post a link to the first thread that I remember robert posting in. As you can see, I attached a link to Wehrmann's statement on how they planned to handle Curley Calf (AM). robert jumped in and claimed they said "[i]they produced that only 1 out of 28 they retained is positive for AM? Doesn't anyone else have the least concern that the herd that bred and owned 9J9, 5H11, 8E8, 1B2, along with the addition of 2536, 1680 and Future Direction genetics has managed to retain only AM free daughters[/i]?" Of course, there was nothing like that in the statement. And I wasn't the only poster to point that out to robert. IMO, he's a gossip and for the most part I ignore him, thinking that most people on the board understand that. But we do have new people joining pretty regular, so I think occasionally I'll call his hand. [url=http://cattletoday.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=53909&p=619068&hilit=wehrmann+statement#p619068]viewtopic.php?f=5&t=53909&p=619068&hilit=wehrmann+statement#p619068[/url] For what it's worth, I think gossips rank at the bottom end of the human race. Gossip and innuendo can do a lot of damage to individuals and breeding programs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cattle Boards
Breeds Board
More on Fawn Calf Syndrome
Top