Montana Loses Bangs Free Status

Help Support CattleToday:

Oldtimer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
3,922
Reaction score
33
Location
Northeast Montana
Second brucellosis case found



By SCOTT McMILLION Chronicle Staff Writer

Bozeman Daily Chronicle

June 10, 2008



LIVINGSTON n Brucellosis has been detected in a Paradise Valley cattle herd, the Montana Department of Livestock announced Monday.



That means the Montana beef industry loses its brucellosis-free status; it also means extra expense and labor for ranchers all over the state.




Gov. Brian Schweitzer said Monday he was saddened but not surprised by the news, an event he has predicted several times.



"It's not a proud day," he said. "But it's not one that didn't come without a lot of predictions."



Federal scientists at a laboratory in Ames, Iowa, confirmed the presence of the disease in one cow Monday, the state DOL said in a written news release.



"In this particular case, the owner did everything right," state Veterinarian Marty Zalusky said. "The cow had been vaccinated twice and was part of a herd management plan."



DOL spokesman Steve Merritt said he'd been ordered not to identify the owner. Schweitzer said the herd was in the Pray area, about 20 miles south of Livingston.



The case illustrates how existing brucellosis vaccines are not 100 percent effective.



In May 2007, the disease was found in a cattle herd from Bridger that had mixed with animals from a Paradise Valley herd. That discovery led to the destruction of 301 cows and 284 calves, a move required by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.



With the second outbreak of the disease comes the automatic loss of Montana's brucellosis-free status. That means all bulls and non-spayed female cattle older than 18 months must be tested for the disease 30 days prior to being shipped out of state, according to the federal rules.



It could mean destruction of the infected animal's home herd.



After the outbreak in Bridger, Schweitzer began pushing for a "split-state status" for the area adjacent to Yellowstone National Park, the nation's last reservoir for the strain of brucellosis that affects cattle. The split-state status, if achieved, would have meant that if brucellosis was found inside the special zone near the park, the rest of the state would have been unaffected.



However, he met intense opposition from the Montana Stockgrowers Association and a number of local ranchers.



The Montana Cattlemen's Association, another trade group, supported the governor.



He accused the Stockgrowers of "mischaracterizing" the split-state proposal.



"I just wish the Stockgrowers would have agreed with the Cattlemen's Association and we could have moved ahead," Schweitzer said. "Had we implemented split state, this wouldn't have affected the rest of the state."



Schweitzer dropped the idea in November in the face of the intense opposition. He said Monday that he believed the status could have been achieved by now if the beef industry had gotten behind it.



Stockgrowers Executive Vice President Errol Rice said Monday he disagreed with that. Working out the complicated rules for the split-state status would have taken up to two years, he said, adding that he still opposes split state.



Both elk and bison carry brucellosis. The disease has a much lower occurrence rate in elk, but they tend to wander farther and mix more with cattle. The brucellosis in the Bridger herd likely came from elk, scientists said last year.



Bison are subjected to hazing and slaughter if they leave the park. Elk are subjected to neither.



Schweitzer stressed that consumers have nothing to fear about consuming Montana beef, but losing the brucellosis-free status could prove expensive for people who raise purebred breeding cattle.



A deal was in the works to export some Montana cattle to Russia, he said, but that could be quashed by the brucellosis news.



"This maybe puts it on the back burner for a few years or maybe kills it altogether," he said.



bozemandailychronicle.com
 
man thats no fun.are all the cows bangs vacced there.if all the ranchers would start bangs vaccing their heifers.that would help control the prob some.but i know youd still have probs with your buff an elk herds.
 
BB -- "In this particular case, the owner did everything right," state Veterinarian Marty Zalusky said. "The cow had been vaccinated twice and was part of a herd management plan."

As far as I know, every state around the park is required to bangs vacc heifers. I only vacc once but if brucellosis were more prevalent I'd vaccinate twice or more.
 
then it sounds like what i call a yellow paint cow.thats a cow that was vacced at an older age an shows a false pos on the test.i bet he will be clean in 60 days.here you have to have 2 clean herd tests.his herd will be qurenteed for 60 more days.
 
contreras6":2pjp9pdt said:
I live in mt. Where were the cases at? This is really bad!

A rancher down by Pray.....

http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles ... ancher.txt

This the same general area of the last one- that was shown to have been caused by either Elk or Bison- altho they could not tell which one....

After the outbreak in Bridger, Schweitzer began pushing for a "split-state status" for the area adjacent to Yellowstone National Park, the nation's last reservoir for the strain of brucellosis that affects cattle. The split-state status, if achieved, would have meant that if brucellosis was found inside the special zone near the park, the rest of the state would have been unaffected.



However, he met intense opposition from the Montana Stockgrowers Association and a number of local ranchers.



The Montana Cattlemen's Association, another trade group, supported the governor.



He accused the Stockgrowers of "mischaracterizing" the split-state proposal.



"I just wish the Stockgrowers would have agreed with the Cattlemen's Association and we could have moved ahead," Schweitzer said. "Had we implemented split state, this wouldn't have affected the rest of the state."



Schweitzer dropped the idea in November in the face of the intense opposition. He said Monday that he believed the status could have been achieved by now if the beef industry had gotten behind it.

I wonder how many of those MSGA members around the state now are going to still think they were right in opposing the "split state" regions so that 95% of the state wouldn't be affected. Now we all have to "pay the Piper"... :( :mad:

Since the government has no policy in effect to control the brucellosis in their parks wildlife- we will have this coming up all the time- unless we can separate out that area and require all cattle coming out of there to be tested...
 
My heart really goes out to my neighbors to the north. Living in the "GYA" ,better known as the Greater Yellowstone Area, makes for raising cattle a lot more challenging. Working with herd management plans, State lines,(states that have different management ideas) and wildlife that help host the disease. These things make me wonder if it is really worth all the hassles that go with it. The big question will be how APHIS handles it. And what hoops you will have to jump through to get your status back. good luck to you.
 
Now its Wyoming!!!!

State lab confirms brucellosis in Daniel-area cattle
By The Associated Press

CHEYENNE, Wyo. - The Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory said it has confirmed positive brucellosis tests for two cows from a Daniel ranch.

The state reported last week that blood tests taken at a sale barn first showed the cows had brucellosis.

The cows then were sent to the state veterinary lab, where the brucellosis bacterium was cultured from the tissues of both cows.

The Wyoming Livestock Board and USDA Animal Plant Health Inspection Service said they plan to test the rest of the ranch's herd to see if more cattle are infected. The state has not released the name of the ranch where the brucellosis occurred.

The Wyoming Livestock Board said the rancher will have to decide whether to slaughter the entire herd or conduct repeated testing and removal of animals that test positive.

If the rancher decides not to slaughter the herd, it could endanger Wyoming's federal status as brucellosis-free.
 

Latest posts

Top