A man I used to go to church with crossed a Charbray bull on Brown Swiss cows sure made some fine looking heifers. Sorry to get off topic.A brown swiss and a red & white Simmental are pretty close cousins.
Most of our cows were in the 1,500 lb range and frame 6.0-6.5 7 years ago. After using some Gelbveigh influence and Angus bulls of current hot Angus genetics we lost frame size, weight and muscling. We went from selling at the top to being docked. Our goal is too get our cows in the 6.0 frame range and in the 1,350-1,500 lb range with most in the 1,400-1,425 lb range. In ours r environment and cows below 1,250 lbs and a 5.5 frame are too small. In our current drought our smaller cows are being culled because they require more inputs. On our forage types we need a high volume type cow.What are you calling small? We have way to much feed stuffs available in the "I" states. When I go to a sale looking for 1,400lbs bred cows I can usually steel them because their not big enough for a lot of producers around here. 1,600-1,800 to 2,000+ is what a lot of nature cows are here. They may raise a big calf, but that's a lot of feed to maintain them.
I learn something new every day! I did not know a smaller cow required more inputs.Most of our cows were in the 1,500 lb range and frame 6.0-6.5 7 years ago. After using some Gelbveigh influence and Angus bulls of current hot Angus genetics we lost frame size, weight and muscling. We went from selling at the top to being docked. Our goal is too get our cows in the 6.0 frame range and in the 1,350-1,500 lb range with most in the 1,400-1,425 lb range. In ours r environment and cows below 1,250 lbs and a 5.5 frame are too small. In our current drought[[ our smaller cows are being culled because they require more inputs]]. On our forage types we need a high volume type cow.
Lee we breed for efficient cattle. Current research and tests show frame size and weight are poor indicators of efficiency. In fact they have shown you can reduce maintenance costs by 25% and still maintain frame size and weight by selecting for efficiency. Normally we have plenty of forage but it very low in nutrients. A cow has to consume a large quantity to maintain their condition. In order for a 5.0 frame or less cow to have enough depth, width and length to have the needed volume they aren't functional in our herd. Again we rely on visual observations of BCS and also current testing and research to select for efficient cattle that will return the most dollars per acre.I learn something new every day! I did not know a smaller cow required more inputs.
Fixed it for you."I don't think it is evolution, I think breeders are selecting for it."
Same thing: breeder selection has been the power of in-breed adaptation.
Not a big deal: semantics maybe, but I disagree. Within species and breeds, the pressures, selections and culling can remove genes over time. This is more important in minor breeds as a closed herd or flock over time creates a unique genepool which can actually create a hybrid pop when reintroduced into the mainstream of the breed or other pocketed populations. A geneticist told me that in long term closed populations there are alleles that do not remain due to others being dominant or by random loss. That is true evolution.Fixed it for you.
I know what you meant and seems like a minor point, but there is no such thing as same breed evolution... selective breeding enhances ability to adapt to environment
Fixed it again for you.Not a big deal: semantics maybe, but I disagree. A geneticist told me that in long term closed populations there are alleles that do not remain due to others being dominant or by random loss. That is adaptive mutation.
Here's someone you can argue with. I've agreed to disagree and to make you happy: you win! But you didn't!AKC articleFixed it again for you.
We are actually on the same page.
Adaptive Mutation was a very important discovery by Darwin.
ie
Bird's beak changing size and shape over generations to adapt to available foods.
Genetic change within a breed is a genetic adaptation, not evolution.
I know it seems like semantics, but without precise language, measurements skew by as much as 45-180 degrees over long periods of time leading to wrong conclusions.
No... we all lose.Here's someone you can argue with. I've agreed to disagree and to make you happy: you win! But you didn't !AKC article
Cargill in High River discounts above 950 on the grid and 1050 on a straight bid. If they need cattle bad enough that discount disappears. In April they discounted one that was 1/2 lb over 1050, end of May the biggest steer I sent was 1170, no discount.It's my understanding that you don't incur a discount for heavy carcasses until you reach 1050 lbs. To have a hot carcass weight of 1050 lbs. the live weight would have to be in the 1750 lb range. That's big in my book.
I'm not sure how they calculate the $B index but more carcass weight would seemingly increase that index
Cargill in High River discounts above 950 on the grid and 1050 on a straight bid. If they need cattle bad enough that discount disappears. In April they discounted one that was 1/2 lb over 1050, end of May the biggest steer I sent was 1170, no discount.It's my understanding that you don't incur a discount for heavy carcasses until you reach 1050 lbs. To have a hot carcass weight of 1050 lbs. the live weight would have to be in the 1750 lb range. That's big in my book.
I'm not sure how they calculate the $B index but more carcass weight would seemingly increase that index
Funny how that works.Cargill in High River discounts above 950 on the grid and 1050 on a straight bid. If they need cattle bad enough that discount disappears. In April they discounted one that was 1/2 lb over 1050, end of May the biggest steer I sent was 1170, no discount.