Marbling...Is it worth it?

Help Support CattleToday:

MikeC

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
7,636
Reaction score
3
Location
Alabama
Living up to potential starts early for cow/calf operations

By Miranda Reiman, Certified Angus Beef LLC
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:58 PM CDT

Getting cattle to hit the higher quality grades takes effort at every link in the production chain. From the cow/calf producer to the feedlot, all must be quality conscious for cattle to gain premiums on a value-based grid.

In a research review, Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB) vice president Larry Corah and supply development director Mark McCully looked at early management factors that affect marbling, the intramuscular flavor fat.



"People used to think marbling was something that only happened in the feedlot," said McCully. "But research shows targeting a high-quality beef market should begin long before that."

Cells begin developing into either muscle or fat before a calf is even born. Once the calf hits the ground, the fat cells start to further differentiate into subcutaneous fat (backfat) and marbling.

"We blame a lot on genetics, but it's management," said Francis Fluharty, animal scientist at The Ohio State University.

Nutrition, from mid-gestation on, has a significant effect on how cells develop.



"Pre-partum nutrition is really important, because the cow sets up the calf's ability to marble," Fluharty said. "In addition to genetics, the cow's body condition and quality of colostrum are very important as they determine the newborn calf's immune status."

"Getting a live, healthy calf on the ground is just the beginning, however. There are many options to weigh after that," Corah said.

Early weaning and feeding a grain-based diet increase marbling significantly, Fluharty says. Ohio research shows that Angus-influence calves weaned at about 100 to 150 days of age graded 90 percent to 95 percent Choice, with 55 percent to 60 percent Certified Angus Beef (CAB) acceptance.

"What we're really trying to do is get these young calves on a high grain diet much earlier in life," Fluharty said.Forage-based rations are more likely to result in rumen end-products of fermentation that convert cells to backfat. By comparison, high-energy grain rations with corn or grain sorghum lead to more propionate, glucose and marbling.

If a producer is unable to early wean, creep feeding could provide some of the same benefits, including increased marbling and weight gain. However, feed efficiencies are reduced compared to early weaning.

"We should not ignore the benefit of these strategies to first-calf heifers and 3-year-olds," Fluharty said. "We take the stress off those young females that are still growing by removing their calves earlier."

Early weaning and creep feeding both require extra facilities and feed investment.

"It's got to be economical or there's no point in doing it," Fluharty said. "If producers do it right and they put an additional 100 pounds of gain on the calf, that's where they make it up."

The most critical management time seems to be the "window" from two weeks before to four weeks after weaning.

Producers have many choices then, with weaning, implanting and health programs varying from ranch to ranch.

"Making sure the calves have the least amount of stress in their lifetime will help ensure they have the greatest amount of marbling," McCully said.

Whether to use a growth implant, what types and timing need to be carefully considered, too.

Carcass quality is everyone's business, Fluharty says.

"It goes all the way through the production system," he said. "We've done an awful lot of work looking at high-marbling genetics - the Angus breed especially - and genetics definitely play a large part in potential.

"But that's all it is: potential," Fluharty said. "You can have the potential, but you can manage that right out of them."
 
"But that's all it is: potential," Fluharty said. "You can have the potential, but you can manage that right out of them
This sentence is as significant as any one in this entire report. As with ANY business, the producer must be educated and prepared to adequately operate his efforts in order to make a profit. Hit and miss, and "hoping" does NOT cut the mustard!

DOC HARRIS
 
I totally agree that early nutrition makes a huge difference on marbling.
I always have mixed feelings about early weaning. I agree that early weaning helps get the cows in great shape for winter, and it also gets the calf on a higher carb diet. But - how early? The whole purpose of that cow's life is to produce a calf for you & produce the milk to raise that calf for pounds of gain to sell.
We compromise & wean first week of Sept. Our calves range from 5-7 months old. We have lots of great forage for the cows (and calves) to graze & put on weight prior to bad weather. The calves are put on a pelleted feed along with grass & hay, so they are ready for the feedlot when we sell.
But, lots of the articles you read talk about 3-4 month old calves at weaning. I can't see it. You lose all that "free" growth from MOM's milk.
 
It is the seedstock producers job to let the commercial man know how to manage the genetics the seedstock producer sells him.

Period.


If the seedstock guy doesn't know how to manage what he creates, then most things beyond him are HIS fault.

The decrease in CAB is directly related to the seedstock producers inability to quantify the product he is currently creating and selling. If the seedstock guy doesn't know how to manage them, how can his customer know?

Sure, there are many poor commercial managers, too. The probably shouldn't be in the business at all. Still, the seedstock producer has an obligation to let his customers know how to manage the genetics he is selling.


mtnman
 
A couple of thoughts:

In human babies fat cells are set after birth to about 18 months, babies that get extra food at that time typically have more fat cells.

I assume that it is a similar situation in cattle. Perhaps heavier milking females would produce higher marbling calves.

Did you ever notice though, how they go out of their way to avoid offending any agribusiness people?

The biggest detriment to marbling is implants, but we don't want to come right out and say quit implanting.

What that was, was an advertisement for creepfeeding which will benefit the feed companies. They also managed to get in a plug for feeding cows better prepartum. So that you guys can go out there and make money for those feedlots and packers. :)
 
mtnman":61tlbujl said:
It is the seedstock producers job to let the commercial man know how to manage the genetics the seedstock producer sells him.

Period.


If the seedstock guy doesn't know how to manage what he creates, then most things beyond him are HIS fault.

The decrease in CAB is directly related to the seedstock producers inability to quantify the product he is currently creating and selling. If the seedstock guy doesn't know how to manage them, how can his customer know?

Sure, there are many poor commercial managers, too. The probably shouldn't be in the business at all. Still, the seedstock producer has an obligation to let his customers know how to manage the genetics he is selling.


mtnman
In whatever endeavor one engages, it is incumbent on all parties involved to work in concert to effect a profitable result. Education and knowledge is the root of any successfful interprise - whether it be obtained from a book or classes, or from one who has the experience to impart knowledge to the customer. mtnman is correct when he says if the seedstock guy doesn't know how to manage - how can his customer know?

In ANY phase of beef production - in spite of all the learning and knowledge that has been acquired in the past regarding same, there seems to be a Catch 22 situation intertwined with function. Differences of opinion exist whenever more than one person has determined that a certain procedure will work for them - even if that option is to do - nothing! But the bottom line here is to do EVERYTHING possible to maximize the genetics that are acquired from the seedstock producer - assuming that the seedstock producer knows what HE is doing! "Acquired Knowledge" seems to be the keywords here!

DOC HARRIS
 
MikeC":1zi79kza said:
"Pre-partum nutrition is really important, because the cow sets up the calf's ability to marble," Fluharty said. "In addition to genetics, the cow's body condition and quality of colostrum are very important as they determine the newborn calf's immune status."

"Getting a live, healthy calf on the ground is just the beginning, however. There are many options to weigh after that," Corah said.

Early weaning and feeding a grain-based diet increase marbling significantly, Fluharty says. Ohio research shows that Angus-influence calves weaned at about 100 to 150 days of age graded 90 percent to 95 percent Choice, with 55 percent to 60 percent Certified Angus Beef (CAB) acceptance.

Maybe I am too old fashioned; BUT I want genetics which will let me feed the mama cows a forage based diet, wean at 6-8 months, and still produce a 550++ lb weaned calf that will still go to the feedlot and marble. I don't want to try to market ~280 lb 100 day old calves and I certainly don't want to be running a kindergarten feedlot on the side. If a 205 day wean calf stays healthy and is fed out according to best management practices, it is the fault of the GENETICS if the calf does not grade. Expecting commercial producers to grain fatten dry cows so the calf will Grade ~18 months from now is silly.
 
If a 205 day wean calf stays healthy and is fed out according to best management practices, it is the fault of the GENETICS if the calf does not grade. Expecting commercial producers to grain fatten dry cows so the calf will Grade ~18 months from now is silly.

Now Brandon, don't be so hard on these AAA folks, they are barely struggling to get by and here you go slamming them. :lol:
 
Top