lakading
Well-known member
MikeC":1mrqbniv said:lakading":1mrqbniv said:Besides, there's not that much diff between an .85 and a .90 in lbs.
Differences in accuracies have nothing to do with lbs. The accuracy number simply indicates the statistical probability that progeny from that bull will be +X lbs bigger at birth, weaning, yearling, etc. than progeny from a bull with a 0 EPD for those traits.
The differences in the statistical probabilities are the "Possible Change Values" which are definitely expressed in pounds.
True. My point was just that the .85 has a 5% more chance of being off from the EPD. The number of pounds off is irrelevant because you cannot predict that anyway since the standard deviations are based on the EPDs and not on the accuracies.