pricefarm":39xdghzd said:
Stocker Steve":39xdghzd said:
Brute 23":39xdghzd said:
Trying to pay for equipment with 30 head is a lot harder than 100 head. If you graph costs vs revenue with cattle there are sweet spots.
Tell me more ?
Yes I would like to know where the sweet spot is also.
Just like others have said cattle is about volume. Its a low margin, high volume game.
From what I see is the killer with cattle are the capital investments not the actual day to day operating costs. The tractors, the trailers, and all the other equipment that we all love to play with.
When you crank up a $30K tractor,with a $15K shredder, that burns 3g/ hr of $3 diesel, uses $450 blades, and $200 hydraulic lines... it puts the pressure on those cows to produce.
When your < 10 head its hard to buy any thing... even a bull is a stretch.
As you get to 30 head you might start looking at a little used tractor, maybe a cattle trailer. Those two items may get you from 30 head to 50 or 60.
So if your graphing your costs per head vs # of head you will start out in the bottom left with some gap. As you move north east they will run fairly proportion until you hit a purchase like a tractor or trailer then your costs/h will spike. Lets say that is at 30 head. Then as you move toward 60 head it will start coming together again until you make another purchase like a tractor, then they will part again.
In a perfect world although you get a spike every time you buy a capital investment it should bring your operational cost per head lower over time.
People who have grown naturally over time know the dynamics of this struggle. When you have small numbers its hard to buy some thing simple like hay rings. We all know they are more efficient but on a small scale like 5 head your pay out may be 10 years. When you get to 100 head you can't hardly afford not to have them.
IMO the spikes come in increments of 30-50 head. If you can be aware of this you can see that some times it is not always wise to add more head because it may kick you right it to that next spike. If your not adding enough head to get you in to that next cost per head valley you may be better staying where you are at. Especially with labor becoming a bigger factor as your head numbers grow.
Every ones numbers will be different but you should see the same trend. I use this a lot when leasing land to determine what I would have to pay for it to be worth while. The further it is from "home base" the more head it has to handle because there will be a certain amount of cost associated with the transportation no matter if its 10 head or 100 head.
There are a ton of different variables and situations but its one more tool in the belt IMO.