WichitaLineMan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2009
- Messages
- 707
- Reaction score
- 0
Also on my picture posts, I'd say about half are on land I own and half on leased ranches.
Jake":3tpkimeg said:I'm going to throw a little economics at this and see if anybody can follow me. Agriculture in general is a "Zero Profit" game. In aspect to ECONOMIC Profit. We are all competing for a scarce resource in land in order to produce our goods. With the way agriculture is set up we have as close to a Perfectly Competitive market as you can get. The stipulations to Perfect Competitiion are -
1) Homogeneous Product
2) Availability from variety of sources
3) Perfect knowledge.
Now as far as the product and suppliers go in ag for the most part Yellow #2 Corn is Yellow #2 Corn everywhere and choice beef is choice beef. We all produce this homogeneous product therefore there is no market power held by individual producers.
Now ECONOMIC Profit is Business Profit minus Opportunity Cost and Opportunity cost on Owners Equity.
Cattle are just a means of adding to the Owners Equity and making a Business Proft. Very rarely does land "pencil out" when it is purchased with borrowed money. The fact is that farmers and investors alike rely on inflation and scarcity to drive the price of the land up to increase their Owner's Equity.
I could probably make a 20 page post on this but I'm sure I'm losing any interest that I started with so I'll put this in a short point.
As a producer we need to figure out what you can give for land to make long run ECONOMIC BREAKEVEN. This will vary with the availability of capital to your operation. If you can add to your assets and cover your opportunity costs. What you pay for the land is somewhat irrelevant.
piedmontese":308qozno said:what i dont understand is how the cattlemen make it n states where u have 2 have so many acres per animal because of the poor grass.i saw an add 4 land where they had 2,500 acres and they said it would support 50 head.how in the heck u ever gonna make that work? in kansas u could run 50 head on 100 acres of grass.
dun":ifftq7yg said:We do it even smipler and it doesn;t matter if it pencils out or not, PAY CASH
So true. At $5000 an acre a small nestegg doesn't buy much more than a garden spot.JHH":gelc1jru said:dun":gelc1jru said:We do it even smipler and it doesn;t matter if it pencils out or not, PAY CASH
That is kind of what I was saying earlier. Lots of old money being spent on ground. Better than a CD or anything else at this point. I just wish I had old money to spend.
But after 50 years of doing it from tiny to larger that small nestegg grows to a pretty decent size. I'ld like to buy Basin but 12 mil is way way out of my leagueTexasBred":2rlxsnmn said:So true. At $5000 an acre a small nestegg doesn't buy much more than a garden spot.JHH":2rlxsnmn said:dun":2rlxsnmn said:We do it even smipler and it doesn;t matter if it pencils out or not, PAY CASH
That is kind of what I was saying earlier. Lots of old money being spent on ground. Better than a CD or anything else at this point. I just wish I had old money to spend.
WichitaLineMan":yj6nx11m said:Make an offer:
I don't want to sell anything tho in order to buy bigger. I just buy and hold.But after 50 years of doing it from tiny to larger that small nestegg grows to a pretty decent size. I'ld like to buy Basin but 12 mil is way way out of my league
msscamp":aaqjmnz1 said:piedmontese":aaqjmnz1 said:what i dont understand is how the cattlemen make it n states where u have 2 have so many acres per animal because of the poor grass.i saw an add 4 land where they had 2,500 acres and they said it would support 50 head.how in the heck u ever gonna make that work? in kansas u could run 50 head on 100 acres of grass.
Why would you assume that the high stocking rate is due to poor grass? A lot of times it is simply due to a lack of rainfall. Here in my area of Wyoming the usual stocking rate is 33 acres/animal unit, but the grass is usually damned good! Our stocking rate is due to the fact that we only get an average of 10" of rainfall/year, not poor grass.
WichitaLineMan":1c0ir18g said:I don't know about the collective wisdom around here.
Home Real Estate in many parts of this country have fallen 30+% over the last 2 and 1/2 years. And Commercial real estate has fallen more than that, but you guys are pretty sure Agricultural land will never fall in value?
Very interesting.
MF135":3dgphidp said:msscamp":3dgphidp said:piedmontese":3dgphidp said:what i dont understand is how the cattlemen make it n states where u have 2 have so many acres per animal because of the poor grass.i saw an add 4 land where they had 2,500 acres and they said it would support 50 head.how in the heck u ever gonna make that work? in kansas u could run 50 head on 100 acres of grass.
Why would you assume that the high stocking rate is due to poor grass? A lot of times it is simply due to a lack of rainfall. Here in my area of Wyoming the usual stocking rate is 33 acres/animal unit, but the grass is usually damned good! Our stocking rate is due to the fact that we only get an average of 10" of rainfall/year, not poor grass.
do what???? The fact that the grass only gets 10" is what makes it "poor".