rbell":2iobu4pg said:Done Done it Dun
How you think #1 and # 2 will come out?
Will Holden or Mc Caskil win?
Craig-TX":1vgbzpkv said:Glad you posted this on a site with mostly conservative participants. If the leeches and losers want to shirk their voting responsibility along with all their other duties it’s fine by me. He he he.
rbell":tqjghbuq said:I hear tell that St Louis is for Mc Caskil, that should shake Holden up.
I just want Holden beaten at all costs after that blackmail stunt he pulled with school funding. He should be in jail
bwranch":zv461zu1 said:Truthfully, I don't have any problems with giving the guys over there a shot at improving the local economy, and I'll probably vote yea on #1 this afternoon. I'm just still pretty sore about the way they handled the "money for education" thing from the get go. Yes, they use all of the gambling money for education as they said, but then they decrease the funding from other sources so that there's no net gain (at least that's my impression). Probably should of seen that one coming, I just think it's a con. Anyway, I have a hard time thinking too highly of the electorate here when I remember that we elected a dead guy to the senate.
Craig-TX":1fg6q2a8 said:I see in the news this morning that CONGRATULATIONS are in order on banning the perverts from getting “married” in your state. If history serves as a guide, it looks fairly safe that you will also have a governor with an R next to his name. Haven’t kept up with any of the other issues.
rbell":r4jhg58k said:You know Dun,
If they want civil unions I don't care, but I am tired of the fringes redefining the meaning of words & things.
Kinda like what is "is" from the klinton era.
I figure Blunt will beat McCaskil easy enough especially with "Rural" support.
It sure did feel good to see that arrogant blackmailing skunk Holden loose.