Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Didn't we just talk about this?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support CattleToday:
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigbluegrass" data-source="post: 1702363" data-attributes="member: 15537"><p>I don't know that most of us have the time to sort thru all of that data to make sense of what we are looking at. Even if you did, there will always be the excuses already listed. (either too much reported or not enough reported, depending on the point you want to make). Raw data is usually accurate, but not very useful. It needs to be filtered and in the filtering process it becomes subject to someone trying to make a point.</p><p></p><p>I downloaded and briefly looked through some of the VAERS data on vaccines for myself. I was surprised at the percentage of incidence related to the COVID 19 shot. COVID 19 accounts for something like 90% or more of the reported adverse affects (2021). That kind of surprised me. There were a few incidences of seasonal flue shot. A few for Zoster by Varzos - I have no idea what that is. Dates are not in the excel sheet I downloaded. I also don't see a description of what [USER=28912]@sstterry[/USER] describes surrounding the incidence in what I downloaded.</p><p></p><p>I would think children are still getting vaccinated. I can't imagine Covid 19 accounts for 90%+ of the vaccines given so far this year. I am sure someone will have an excuse why there are so many incidences related to the COVID 19 shot. I won't speculate on that, I was just surprised it was such a high percentage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigbluegrass, post: 1702363, member: 15537"] I don't know that most of us have the time to sort thru all of that data to make sense of what we are looking at. Even if you did, there will always be the excuses already listed. (either too much reported or not enough reported, depending on the point you want to make). Raw data is usually accurate, but not very useful. It needs to be filtered and in the filtering process it becomes subject to someone trying to make a point. I downloaded and briefly looked through some of the VAERS data on vaccines for myself. I was surprised at the percentage of incidence related to the COVID 19 shot. COVID 19 accounts for something like 90% or more of the reported adverse affects (2021). That kind of surprised me. There were a few incidences of seasonal flue shot. A few for Zoster by Varzos - I have no idea what that is. Dates are not in the excel sheet I downloaded. I also don't see a description of what [USER=28912]@sstterry[/USER] describes surrounding the incidence in what I downloaded. I would think children are still getting vaccinated. I can't imagine Covid 19 accounts for 90%+ of the vaccines given so far this year. I am sure someone will have an excuse why there are so many incidences related to the COVID 19 shot. I won't speculate on that, I was just surprised it was such a high percentage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Non-Cattle Specific Topics
Coffee Shop
Didn't we just talk about this?
Top