Herefordcross
Well-known member
Just curious about what those of you that creep calves are switching to given the high feed costs?
Herefordcross":1lh27m6r said:
I find that really hard to believe that your friend lost 32 dollars per head on account of the higher corn cost. If he tried to contract all inputs and had made sure he could sell the cattle on the board at a profit I don't see how he lost money. Unless of course he had a high death loss which is no fault of the high corn price. Perhaps your friend could not make a profit on paper thru contracting but he thought he would buy the cattle anyway hoping it would turn around before he sold them. Or perhaps he never tried contracting anything and just bought the cattle. Regardless if he lost money on cattle last go around and he bought in the fall that is poor management. The writing was on the wall in late september early october with the corn price. I find it odd when someone says they lost money feeding cattle in a feedlot on account of the high corn price. Virtually impossible to do. You might not make any money on cattle in the feedlot because of high priced corn but you won't lose any for sure. If you can't make a positive cash flow before you buy on account of high priced corn don't buy them. If you buy the cattle anyway and lose money thats not the corns fault that gets pinned right on poor managment.Herefordcross":24lxp1pi said:I have been searching for alternatives and I've come down to a 14% pro. 2% fat, which is safe for replacement heifers and it gonna run us about $220/ton US. The type of cattle we run we have to creep or we'll never compete come sale time.
A friend of ours contract feeds about 300 steers from fall to spring on his place and they expect a certain amount of gain and the lost about $32/head this past go round due to corn going above $4/bushel.
Herefordcross":mr707t6p said:
This taken right off Ft. Pierre Livestocks website. http://www.ftpierrelivestock.com/mnmtranching":2f63b3pj said:I wonder how much per hundred weight I would need to get out of my calves to make up for 14% creep at $220 per ton. Nope, not going to work. :roll:
Even when it is in black and white people still want to argue the economics of feeding cattle with a feedlot owner, You want to sit and nit pick over interest, labor, machinery, I could also sit and nit pick with you just the same .11 per pound feed is outrageous, You won't have any of the expenses you listed, for that price I would expect it delivered into a feeder provided by the mill and financed by the mill. 7 to 1 is horrible if you have that bad conversion on those calves I would suggest improving your herd even a holstien calf will do that without mothers milk. I used those wild figures just to make a fair arguement to those blinded by the tall grass. Trying to keep it simple.Howdyjabo":q23curmj said:You left off some important figures to calculate a true profit.
interest on the money invested in the feed
Interest and cost of storage and the feeders
labor/electricity,fuel,machinery invested in putting out the feed
and the dock/lb at saletime for selling lbs instead of frame(there is one most years). I say this because you are only comparing weights at sale time--- instead of age and frame.Around here A 6 wt with a medium flesh will sell higher than a fleshed calf the same weight. That could be as much as ten dollars off your $32 profit on the creep fed calves alone.
I'll give you that the commercial economics don't apply to seedstock operations-- but IMO they should be used anyhow if your end market is commercial-- I can see why they are not- Alot of buyers are going to be impressed with fat slick animals wether they should be or not.
there is a time when creepfeeding pays-- but most of the time when feed goes up it doesn't (barring short term grass shortages). I don't think feeds costs are going down soon(if ever) so suggesting that instead of looking for a cheaper creep feed the answer might just be in interseeding and intensive grazing is good advice.
Another option is to find a local byproduct that there isn't a commercial market for.
Pasture condition. Yep your right that was the exact reason why the calves weighed more in my example it had nothing to do with the feed they ate. Here I was trying to help you understand the economics of something other than free grass and still it went right over your head. Like I said mnmtranching I like guys like you. You give me the cheap compensatory gain instead of pocketing it yourself. I don't mind sharing the income with the cow calf guys by trying to explain how this works because without them I don't have any calves to buy but geez a guy can only try so hard to help the helpless. 1 pound of feed along with mothers milk will make more beef than 1 pound of feed in a feedlot without milk think about it if we feedlot owners can do it why can't you.mnmtranching":1ivv6qhk said:Hanks calves, 622 creep fed vs 464 non creep fed means nothing to me. To many variables. Type cattle, age, pasture conditions, parasites, nutrients, etc.
I can get creep delivered for 180. per ton. And I start feeding in a creep area about 1 month before weaning. My steers will wean better than 6.
somn said:You give me the cheap compensatory gain instead of pocketing it yourself. quote]
Somn, I know there has been lots of research out there showing compensetory gain on stocker calves. However, while I was in Grad school at Auburn, there was a Doctoral student from Mexico Jose Z (I can not spell his last name) that did a study on compensetory growth. In his study he never observed compensetory growth. I do not know if this was a fluke but one one think that in 6yrs of research if there was any validity in compensetory growth his study would have shown it.
I know a calf nursing and eating grain grows like nobody's business. My point being is that I am not convinced that the compensetory growth so many stocker people talk about is actually accuring.
Back to Jose research he found that the calves that had been preconditioned wormed , vaccinated, started on feed gain faster than those that had not been preconditioned.
If you do a search in the Agronomy Journal you should be able to find his published paper. I wish I could remeber more specifics obout his materials and methods.
Herefordcross":2t10rkqy said:Just curious about what those of you that creep calves are switching to given the high feed costs?
So are you trying to tell me that when grass is a part of the cattles diet it has a negative impact on feed conversion. Wow here all I have been reading about from people posting on here is how grass is king. I've even seen it stated "without grass you can't make it with cattle". Now your telling me grass will actually cost more money. Those blinded by the tall grass are not going to like hearing that.Stocker Steve":31theubw said:Feed conversion is usually much better in a dry lot than on pasture. It is difficult to get a pasture creep feed conversion better than 10 to 1 due to substitution. This is where the feed lots have an advantage SOMN.