Cattlemen Fight Packer Ownership

Help Support CattleToday:

Oldtimer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
3,918
Reaction score
13
Location
Northeast Montana
Keep large meatpackers from owning and processing cattle



By BILL BULLARD**

The Bismarck Tribune - North Dakota

Feb 11, 2008



An intense conflict is being waged in Congress. At stake is the security of U.S. consumers' meat supply. Security is dependent on the structure of our production system. A system where control is distributed among hundreds of thousands of independent livestock producers, geographically dispersed, is more secure than a system concentrated in a few geographic locations and controlled by only a few large multinational meatpackers.



Our meat supply, secured by a widely dispersed production structure, is now in jeopardy. By the 1990s, our poultry industry, once characterized by tens of thousands of independent businesses, was reduced to about 50 integrated firms. U.S. hog operations, which numbered 667,000 just 25 years ago, were reduced 90 percent to only 67,000 operations by 2005.



Livestock production is now nearly completely controlled by only a handful of meatpackers that have virtually decimated the widely dispersed, family-farm structure of U.S. livestock production - with one notable exception. While the number of cattle operations shrank nearly 40 percent from 1980 to 2005, the cattle industry remains the last frontier that large meatpackers hope to dominate - it is the only major livestock sector not already corporately controlled from birth to plate. With about 900,000 cattle operations remaining, independent cattle producers still have the critical mass necessary to maintain a viable industry - provided Congress takes steps to restore their industry's competitiveness.



Farmers and ranchers, who raise and feed cattle, are reaching out to consumers and Congress for help to overcome the large meatpackers' efforts to capture control over the entire cattle industry. Meatpackers are employing the same anti-competitive practices to take control of the cattle industry as they used to decimate the independent structure of the other livestock industries: restrictions on market access that lead to price control and manipulation - anti-competitive practices that disrupt the free-market system.



Congress now realizes that America has been harmed by the alarming contraction of its livestock industries, causing the security of our meat supply to be more vulnerable than ever. In the 2007 farm bill, Congress is attempting to prohibit the largest meatpackers from owning and feeding cattle prior to slaughter.



The largest meatpackers are the only buyer for cattle producers' slaughter-ready cattle. Anti-competitive practice enables meatpackers to manipulate prices paid to all independent cattle producers. They restrict producer access to their plants by refusing to buy cattle from cattle producers and fill their plants' needs with millions of their own cattle. This drives producers' cattle prices downward, making independent businesses unprofitable.



The large meatpackers are formidable adversaries highly skilled at pulling the wool over consumers' eyes. They erroneously suggest that Congress' measure would eliminate beneficial marketing agreements, despite the measure's protection of such agreements when producers maintain ownership of, and participate in, the production of livestock. The multinational meatpackers are attempting to enlist consumers' help to derail congressional efforts to prohibit their anti-competitive practices by waving an altruistic banner, claiming that such control is justified by the consumers' desire for a consistent quality product. Empirical evidence, however, shows just how disingenuous they are.



Although poll after poll shows that consumers overwhelmingly want a label informing them of the country-of-origin of their meat purchases, these meatpackers are fighting to prevent consumers from having this information. Although polls show that consumers support voluntary testing for bovine spongiform encephalopathy, these meatpackers are fighting voluntary testing. Although both cattle groups and consumer groups requested that the Canadian border remain closed to older Canadian cattle and beef that are at higher risk for BSE, these meatpackers are fighting the request.



Congress and consumers must not fall for the multinational meatpackers' attempts at deception. The meatpackers are not fighting for the best interests of consumers. Instead, they are fighting for their own self-interests: more power, more control, and more money. Working together, cattle producers and consumers can protect the security of our meat supply by supporting Congress' efforts to prohibit meatpacker ownership of livestock, helping restore the competitiveness of the U.S. cattle industry.



**Bill Bullard, of Billings, is the CEO of R-CALF USA., representing the interests of thousands of U.S. farmers and ranchers who raise and feed cattle.



bismarcktribune.com
 

mwj

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
1,211
Reaction score
42
Location
central Ill.
OT maybe someday you will get your wish and they will outlaw those nasty packers :cowboy: Sure hope you have a hankerin to eat a lot of that good pure Montana beef! Might make good compost if you addd enough wood chips :roll:
 
OP
O

Oldtimer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
3,918
Reaction score
13
Location
Northeast Montana
mwj":2r5mvldu said:
OT maybe someday you will get your wish and they will outlaw those nasty packers :cowboy: Sure hope you have a hankerin to eat a lot of that good pure Montana beef! Might make good compost if you addd enough wood chips :roll:

When they get those packer corporations that own 10-20-30 slaughter plants around the world out of the business of owning cattle- we may again have many Montana plants like we had before...And if you add in M-COOL that these packers have been using to fraudulently pass off their owned cheap imported beef as US beef- all the small rancher backed Montana plants selling Montana Beef/USA Beef may again be viable....
 

mwj

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
1,211
Reaction score
42
Location
central Ill.
OT if they were to start breaking ground today how quick can they do it? Do you have room to stockpile a couple of calf crops while they build!!Will these new laws force them to pay you that ''majic'' fair price :roll: Maybe you just want to stop the flow so they can bring in that southern beef without much protest!
 
OP
O

Oldtimer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
3,918
Reaction score
13
Location
Northeast Montana
mwj":34nvat73 said:
OT if they were to start breaking ground today how quick can they do it? Do you have room to stockpile a couple of calf crops while they build!!Will these new laws force them to pay you that ''majic'' fair price :roll: Maybe you just want to stop the flow so they can bring in that southern beef without much protest!

Some of the plants are sitting there already- empty......Unable to compete when these major multinational packers are allowed to use deception, fraud, collusion, and monopoly tactics to manipulate prices and market their product....

If you get a chance go to the library/bookstore and get a copy of and read the book- Past Present And how we can survive the Future in the beef cattle business by Benjamin C. Roberts (Or if anyone is interested- I can give you an address where you can purchase a copy)....It was written by an insider to the packer industry- that shows they've had a longtime history of collusion and monopolistic tactics mirrored only by the Mafia- up to and including intermarriage between the ownership families......
 

Latest posts

Top