Canadian Beef Negatively Affecting US Markets

Help Support CattleToday:

Oldtimer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
3,922
Reaction score
33
Location
Northeast Montana
US cattle markets shaken by suspect Canada mad cow
Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:17 PM ET
Printer Friendly | Email Article | Reprints | RSS

By Jerry Bieszk and Bob Burgdorfer

CHICAGO (Reuters) - A possible new case of mad cow disease in Canada rattled the U.S. cattle markets on Thursday because the animal in question was born after a 1997 feed ban that was enacted to prevent the disease.

Investors fretted that the discovery, which could be the fifth native-born case of the brain-wasting bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in Canada, could shake consumer confidence in the $200 billion U.S. beef and cattle production industry.

Canadian officials said earlier Thursday that the suspected case was discovered in a 6-year-old Holstein dairy cow in British Columbia which did not enter the human food chain. Final test results are expected on Sunday.

Officials said the infected cow was born in April 2000, after the Canadian government prohibited cattle from eating feed containing ruminant protein. The ban was put in place by the United States and Canada in 1997.

Since Canadian beef and cattle are shipped into the United States, there were concerns that the finding could affect demand for all beef.

U.S. consumers have continued to buy beef despite three mad cow cases in the United States and four previously confirmed cases in Canada.

"So far domestic demand has not shrunk due to the publicity of mad cow. As we go forward, will that attitude change? I think you are always concerned," said Don Roose, analyst with U.S. Commodities Inc.

The United States Agriculture Department said it has not drawn any conclusions regarding Canada's suspected case.

"Should it be positive, we're prepared to send a team to Canada to help with the epidemiological investigation," said Ed Lloyd, USDA spokesman.

Mad cow disease, or BSE, is a fatal brain disease in cattle. Scientists believe humans can contract a similar fatal disease by eating infected material from contaminated animals.

The disease is not contagious in cattle, but is believed to be spread by feed made from animal parts, called meat and bone meal.

The National Cattlemen's Beef Association, a cattle producers trade group, said Thursday's news should not affect beef trade between the United States and Canada.

"The United States accepts beef and cattle from Canada that is under 30 months of age, which is an internationally recognized age marker for safety because BSE is a condition found in older cattle," the NCBA said.

However, R-CALF-USDA, another cattle trade group, argued that Canada's safety measures are not sufficient and that the United States should do more to protect consumers here.

"Already, two Canadian BSE cases born after Canada's feed ban have conclusively proven that Canada's feed ban was not effective in preventing the spread of BSE," said Bill Bullard, chief executive of R-CALF USA.

Bullard said the United States should require Canada to close the "known loopholes." It also suggested the United States halt live cattle imports from Canada until the changes are made.

A U.S. consumer group also said more needs to be done.

"The feed ban clearly was not working in Canada. It makes it hard to say the feed ban is your firewall. We've always said these feed bans in the United States and Canada are like picket fences," said Michael Hanson of Consumers Union.

At the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, live cattle futures, which price cattle destined for processing into beef, were higher early on Thursday, but turned lower after the suspected Canadian case was announced, CME traders said.

Cattle for June delivery closed at 75.275 cents per lb, down 0.375 cent for the day. The contract had peaked Thursday at 76.325 cents.

The American Meat Institute, a meat industry trade group, said eating beef cuts has never been associated with any BSE-related disease.

"Parts of the animal that can pose a risk are removed and do not enter the U.S. or Canadian food supplies. No variant CJD cases have occurred as a result of eating U.S. or Canadian beef products," the AMI said in a statement.

Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, or vCJD, is the human form of mad cow disease, which scientists believe can be spread by eating contaminated parts from an infected animal.
 
Weaknesses Found in U.S. Mad Cow Feed Ban

WASHINGTON, DC, March 15, 2005 (ENS) - U.S. cattle are "at risk of spreading" mad cow disease because of weaknesses in a federal government program to keep certain kinds of banned animal protein out of cattle feed, Congressional investigators said in a report made public today.

More than five million cattle across Europe have been killed to stop the spread of mad cow disease, formally called bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Found in 26 countries, including Canada and the United States, BSE is believed to spread through animal feed that contains protein from BSE infected animals. Consuming meat from infected cattle has also been linked to the deaths of about 150 people worldwide.

The feed given to cattle is not supposed to contain the nervous system tissue of other ruminant animals. (Photo courtesy Newaygo County MSU Extension) In its report, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said weaknesses in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) program for keeping nervous system tissue of ruminant animals out of cattle feed "continue to limit the effectiveness" of a 1997 ban on feeding this material to cattle.

In a February 25 letter to the Congressmen and Senators who requested the report, GAO Managing Director, Natural Resources and Environment, Robert Robinson acknowledged that the FDA does not agree with many of the conclusions of his report and warned against taking FDA reports to mean that the industry is in compliance with the feed ban.

"FDA believes that it already reports inspection results in a complete and accurate context, as we recommend. We disagree," wrote Robinson. "As noted above, given the data concerns and compliance unknowns raised in this report, FDA¹s data should not be used to project industry compliance."

The ban was established to keep infectious prions out of cattle feed. Known to cause BSE, these prions are misfolded proteins most likely to be found in the brain, spinal cord and small intestines of infected animals.

The FDA has made needed improvements to its management and oversight of the feed-ban rule in response to GAO's 2002 report, but the Congressional investigators say, program weaknesses "continue to undermine the nation¹s firewall against BSE," the GAO reports.

? FDA acknowledges that there are more feed manufacturers and transporters, on-farm mixers, and other feed industry businesses that are subject to the feed ban than the approximately 14,800 firms inspected to date; however, it has no uniform approach for identifying additional firms.

? FDA has not reinspected approximately 2,800, or about 19 percent, of those businesses, in five or more years; several hundred are potentially high risk. FDA does not know whether those businesses now use prohibited material in their feed.

? FDA's feed-ban inspection guidance does not include instructions to routinely sample cattle feed to test for potentially prohibited material as part of the compliance inspection. Instead, it includes guidance for inspectors to visually examine facilities and equipment and review invoices and other documents.

? Feed intended for export is not required to carry a caution label "Do not feed to cattle or other ruminants," when the label would be required if the feed were sold domestically. Without that statement, feed containing prohibited material could be inadvertently or intentionally diverted back to U.S. cattle or given to foreign cattle.

? FDA has not always alerted the U.S. Department of Agriculture and states when it learned that cattle may have been given feed that contained prohibited material. This lapse has been occurring even though FDA's guidance calls for such communication.

? Although research suggests that cattle can get BSE from ingesting even a small amount of infected material, inspectors do not routinely inspect or review cleanout procedures for vehicles used to haul cattle feed. On the positive side, the FDA has established a uniform method of conducting compliance inspections and training FDA inspectors, as well as state inspectors who carry out inspections under agreements with FDA, on the new method.

Senator Saxby Chambliss chairs the Senate Agriculture Committee and was one of the legislators who requested this GAO report. (Photo courtesy Office of the Senator) The FDA has also implemented new data-entry procedures that are designed to more reliably track feed-ban inspection results.

Consequently, the GAO says, the Food and Drug Administration has a better management tool for overseeing compliance with the feed-ban rule and a data system that better conforms to standard database management practices.

The Congressional investigators recommend that the FDA, among other things, develop procedures for finding additional firms subject to the feed-ban and using tests to augment inspections.

The FDA responded that the study was thorough but disagreed on four of nine recommendations.

The GAO said it "continues to believe that, given the discovery of BSE in North America and the oversight gaps described in the report, the recommended actions are needed to protect U.S. cattle from BSE

[/b]

Sweet dreams dick
 
frenchie- Just what I've been saying all along- we have loopholes in our feedban- same as Canada has loopholes in its ban which has fostered 3 POST feedban cattle...And until we close all these loopholes we should not be importing beef and live cattle from countries that have much higher rates of BSE- namely Japan and Canada....To do so just further endangers the US cattle herd and perpetuates the spread of the disease along with exposing the US consumer to a higher risk factor....
 
Oldtimer
And until we close all these loopholes we should not be importing beef and live cattle from countries that have much higher rates of BSE- namely Japan and Canada....

Are you kidding? "Much" higher levels than the United States? Maybe you need another math class, but there is not much difference between the US' 3 cases and Canada's 5 cases. Even Japan at, what are they now, 26 cases? is not "high" considering they test every animal. How many would the US come up with if they tested every animal?

And once again in this Canadian case (for the third time), it was not an animal going for slaughter, it was a cow that was injured during calving and the owner called the CFIA to collect a sample before she was disposed of. Haven't seen an American who cares enough about the industry down there to be that honest.
 
Oldtimer
And until we close all these loopholes we should not be importing beef and live cattle from countries that have much higher rates of BSE- namely Japan and Canada....
2centsworth
Are you kidding? "Much" higher levels than the United States? Maybe you need another math class, but there is not much difference between the US' 3 cases and Canada's 5 cases. Even Japan at, what are they now, 26 cases? is not "high" considering they test every animal. How many would the US come up with if they tested every animal?



Actually your numbers are wrong- Canada has 6 "origin" cases and the US has 2 in a cattle population 8 times that of Canadas -- but 3 of Canadas are POST feedban showing that its infectivity and spread has not been identified or halted...

Japan has 26- but in a very small cattle population....And now they have one that is 20 months old that may throw a monkeywrench into all the works.....

How many would the US have if we had tested all ? I have no idea- but it is what we should have done from day one in both countries when it was found...Tested all- found the TRUE extent of the infection- closed ALL feed ban loopholes and treated this as a serious health and long term industry threat- rather than USDA's and CFIA's pooh-poohing it away...What has it been- 3-4 years now since this started and we still have no real answers on extent of infection or source of infections, with no real foreign markets opened up and the consumer confidence is waning rather than growing....

Creekstone and those packers that wanted to test should have been allowed to.....

How many years do you sit on your duff? We should have learned from Englands mistakes- but we didn't.......
 
Oldtimer":18ufhniy said:
...What has it been- 3-4 years now since this started and we still have no real answers on extent of infection or source of infections, with no real foreign markets opened up and the consumer confidence is waning rather than growing....

.......

No real foreign markets....You had your chance with Japan Ot same as u.s...
 

Latest posts

Top