frenchie":37eskvvs said:Where the be nice do you pick that garbage up I never once said that I don,t believe in supply and demand..I said I did not think a one-time per head $30 dollar fee would hurt supply the way you think it would I,m sure you had a head injury at some point.
So, you DO believe in supply and demand, but you DON'T think $30/head would affect supply.. Hmmmm.. If that were the case, then prices would already be $30/head lower than they are right now. That's how supply and demand works. Buyers pay as little as they can to keep supply up, and producers make as little as they can to continue producing...
It's not just me saying that, mind you.. It's basic economic principal..
frenchie":37eskvvs said:It would all depend..Now would you bale out if that happened.
What in the world could it depend on, frenchie?!?? Talk about head injuries... :roll: If my profits were running at about $100/head, I'd absolutely bale if a $300 fee were imposed on slaughter cattle. Why would I continue to raise cattle at a consistent $200/head loss??
Why would ANYBODY?? (Oh, wait, they wouldn't... Supply and demand rears its head again!)
frenchie":37eskvvs said:For the 3rd time...I have to lose money consistently. And in case you can,t figure that out ..I have over the good yrs.. consistently put a certain % of funds away for a rainy day. To draw on in lean times...
I said it before I,m in this for the long haul.
Nice try, but you still haven't answered the question.. Since I've asked it about three times already, I can see that I'm going to have to ask you the question differently..
Here goes: Frenchie, would you continue to raise cattle for a consistent $50/head profit, with no increase in sight?
Now, to give you a leg up, here's my game plan after you answer.. If you say yes, I'll go lower. If you say no, I'll go higher... Eventually :shock: we'll get to the figure I was asking for to begin with... When we get to that figure, I'll remind you that there are producers out there with the same bottom dollar as you, who are already within $30 of it.. All that's left to do is add that $30 fee and POOF -- they drop out, and the supply side is undeniably shrunken. You've already said that you believe in supply and demand, so you shouldn't have a problem seeing that, as supply shrinks, prices increase. In other words, the market corrects...
frenchie":37eskvvs said:This getting tiring..Talk about getting off topic Geez....What are you trying to prove here..I never once said I don,t believe in supply and demand and its effects on the market..I said i don,t believe a one -time per head $30 fee.would effect the market the way you seem to think.In other words i don,t agree with you do you get it huh ..i doubt that you do.Like talking to a post
I'm trying to prove that, just because a $30/head loss in profit might not make YOU reconsider raising cattle, it would certainly have that effect on some producers who are barely skimming by as it is...
(Ya know, when put that simply, it makes the whole concept seem even MORE like a no brainer......)