Nesikep
Well-known member
Here's something scary for y'all... pure bullshyte, and the vet ought to have their license revoked
https://www.facebook.com/POVnow/videos/ ... f=NEWSFEED
https://www.facebook.com/POVnow/videos/ ... f=NEWSFEED
Sadly too many prosecutors in usa view their job as getting convictions and not justice.Nesikep":1id1yhjk said:...sounded like they cherry picked 'evidence' to present to the judge, ignoring the written statements of the other vet ....
From what I gather, the judge granting the warrant was only presented with one (the d@mning) vet's evidence and not the other one.. so on that basis I would say the judge was correct, and it was the LEO's at fault here for cherry pickingSon of Butch":3pcjhrom said:Sadly too many prosecutors in usa view their job as getting convictions and not justice.Nesikep":3pcjhrom said:...sounded like they cherry picked 'evidence' to present to the judge, ignoring the written statements of the other vet ....
Seems in their own mind total convictions is how they measure job performance and let the facts be dxnmed.
Aaron":1ssqxy8r said:This all goes back to the fact that farm groups need to be proactive in bringing forward policy to state leaders to form animal welfare legislation. If they don't, animal rights will decide it for them and then they might be lucky to get amendments. Put your head in the sand if you want, but the wolves will still chew out your @ss.
boondocks":rpwak2g9 said:Aaron":rpwak2g9 said:This all goes back to the fact that farm groups need to be proactive in bringing forward policy to state leaders to form animal welfare legislation. If they don't, animal rights will decide it for them and then they might be lucky to get amendments. Put your head in the sand if you want, but the wolves will still chew out your @ss.
The interview pointed out that the farm lobbyists fought hard and got most of what they wanted in the bill, and were crowing about how great a bill it was for them when it passed. If so, gotta think the problem maybe isn't with the law itself but the lack of common sense in enforcing it....
Boot Jack Bulls":17xt6u49 said:There is a case going on just a couple miles down the road from me right not with a group of horses that are in deplorable conditions. Drive by the place, and no sane person would dispute that the owners should not have the horses. There is a similar case that has been going on for over a year about an hour north of me also. That guy still has his horses too. Everyone comments on social media about how the local law enforcement should step in, call the ASPCA, ect. The thing they do not think about is, the very rights that allow these people to keep their animals in these conditions are also the rights that protect them from a nosy/vindictive/angry neighbor/ex/whatever causing them to loose they animals they care for well. The laws that limit the police ability are there so we aren't part of a police state. You can't have your cake and eat it too! I wonder how many of my do-gooder neighbors that are so outraged would be willing to donate hay, time or even take in these animals....I'm guessing none. I'm not saying that the owner isn't a poor excuse of a human in my opinion for letting these animals go through this, but I am sick to death of the monday morning quarterbacking of animal owners. End of rant!