anyone NOT use mineral?

Cattle problems.

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby angus9259 » Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:54 am

cow pollinater wrote:Edited to add: I didn't use any mineral at all for awhile and I decided it was cheaper to put out a few sacks than it was to go rope sick cattle and pay for extra semen. a few doses of antibiotics and the time it takes to rope a footrot cow is more than a sack of mineral... Ever extra straw of good semen is worth a sack of mineral...


So now that you use mineral, no more sick cattle or open cows? Less? How many less? How can you actually corrolate that they were sick or open due to mineral?
angus9259
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 1784
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:29 am
Location: Michigan

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby cow pollinater » Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:36 pm

Footrot is a fairly common ailment in our foothill cattle. I haven't had a case this year while a nieghbor of mine that doesn't use mineral has had three cases and he's only got forty cows with genetics similar to mine. I can't really say on grass tetany as we never got the conditions right for it to hit hard but I haven't seen any this year. Same with scours.
On my registered herd, I don't see the copper color on the tops of my angus cows anymore and I am getting them bred back alot faster. I got to where I was syncing cows when I wasn't using mineral just to get them cycling at forty five days and for the last two years I've been able to breed them all on natural heats just by glancing at them once a day.
The real noticable diferance has been on the charolais heifers. I was having a hard time getting them cycling to calve as two year olds and now they're maturing a little quicker.
I had a dairyman that decided that mineral was just another way for feed salesman to make money and cattle didn't need it. To prove it he pulled it out of the feed without saying anything to anybody and sat back and waited. It took three weeks for the cattle to become deficient and about forty five days after that for me to notice that something was "off". The vets and herdsman didn't notice and it was subtle but it was there. I finally showed him on paper where things went bad and he put the mineral back in. It took about two weeks and then things got back to normal.
cow pollinater
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 2392
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: Central CA

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby TexasBred » Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:36 pm

What was off??
America is one of the few places on earth where the 'poor' are overweight and have personalized ringtones
User avatar
TexasBred
Mentor
Mentor
 
Posts: 15147
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Location: Heart of Texas

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby cow pollinater » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:59 pm

TexasBred wrote:What was off??

The first sign was runny mucous or none at all on the hot cows. Then I started getting "cystics" that weren't cystic. We had about ten percent more opens on vet check but still really good checks. First service conception dropped but it held up in second and third service so nobody else noticed. I saw it because I was breeding more cows than I should be. (which is great for me but my job is to support the dairymans business)
I had to dig through dairy comp and go back for three years and show how the cows had performed year round, specifically under stress/heat stress, and then compare it to the year in question and then it was fairly obvious...Three weeks after he had pulled the mineral his components took a very slight dip, first service started to suck, mastitis became a little more of a problem heat stress lasted ALOT longer than it had in previous years... all of it was really subtle but when we started looking at specific dates it all pointed to just after he pulled the mineral.
cow pollinater
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 2392
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: Central CA

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby thwack » Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:57 pm

The local Purina dealer says to use approx. 1 bag of W&R mineral per mature cow per year.
thwack
Beginner
Beginner
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:03 pm
Location: East Central MO

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby angus9259 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 6:33 am

[quote="cow pollinater"]It could also be bored cattle. If you make it really easy on them they'll take advantage of it. I put out protien tubs in places that are conveniant for the cattle only when I want to suplement protien. They will stand there and lick it regardless of their need for protien and minerals.


But how do YOU determine what THEIR need is? Maybe it is that high? Also - there's a recommended in take on these minerals that contain IGR and/or Bovatec so you can't/shouldn't hide it from them if they are within that range.
angus9259
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 1784
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:29 am
Location: Michigan

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby ANAZAZI » Fri Apr 27, 2012 6:53 am

The mineral you feed changes the mineral profile of the land in long terms. It is recycled through urine and manure and comes back in the forage. On the new land the cows wolf down minerals and salt.
On the land we owned a long time the cows eat way less minerals and do not eat salt at all.
Both cases they have free access to it.
Brindles have more fun!
ANAZAZI
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:34 am
Location: sweden

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby tom4018 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 6:54 am

thwack wrote:The local Purina dealer says to use approx. 1 bag of W&R mineral per mature cow per year.

Guess he thinks the label is wrong, that is only 2 oz per day.
User avatar
tom4018
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 1997
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 8:46 am
Location: Kentucky

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby 3waycross » Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:46 am

tom4018 wrote:
thwack wrote:The local Purina dealer says to use approx. 1 bag of W&R mineral per mature cow per year.

Guess he thinks the label is wrong, that is only 2 oz per day.


Guess that's the year round avg! Might not be too wrong.
There are 3 kinds of people in the world. Those who can do math and those who can't
User avatar
3waycross
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 9707
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:54 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby CKC1586 » Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:47 pm

angus9259 wrote:
CKC1586 wrote:What about selenium? If you drop the mineral supplement how you gonna get enough selenium to them???


Good question. My question: do they need it? As mentioned - plenty of folks around here just put out salt or nothing and don't seem to have any more or less problems than I do.

Losing a calf crop to white muscle disease would be quite a costly gamble! I wouldn't want to risk going without selenium.
Common sense is not common....
User avatar
CKC1586
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:16 pm
Location: Michigan USA

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby TexasBred » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:44 pm

angus9259 wrote:
cow pollinater wrote:Edited to add: I didn't use any mineral at all for awhile and I decided it was cheaper to put out a few sacks than it was to go rope sick cattle and pay for extra semen. a few doses of antibiotics and the time it takes to rope a footrot cow is more than a sack of mineral... Ever extra straw of good semen is worth a sack of mineral...


So now that you use mineral, no more sick cattle or open cows? Less? How many less? How can you actually corrolate that they were sick or open due to mineral?


Angus you won't always see obvious signs like really "sick" cattle. You just end up with a herd of cattle with different defficiencies. This can and will affect everything from milk production to estrus to conception to health of new borns even to life or death of newborns. In short a lot of unthrifty cows and calves.
America is one of the few places on earth where the 'poor' are overweight and have personalized ringtones
User avatar
TexasBred
Mentor
Mentor
 
Posts: 15147
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Location: Heart of Texas

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby hooknline » Fri Apr 27, 2012 4:46 pm

Or to put it really short: hard doers
That light you see at the end of tunnel, it's just a freight train coming your way
User avatar
hooknline
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 7207
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:37 pm
Location: A one light town in central Fl.

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby fitz » Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:49 pm

thwack wrote:The local Purina dealer says to use approx. 1 bag of W&R mineral per mature cow per year.


That's pretty close for me. After this thread I went back and ran some numbers. My last year average ran 2.5 oz per day.

fitz
fitz
Rancher
Rancher
 
Posts: 656
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 5:36 pm
Location: S.W. Virginia

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby Jeanne - Simme Valley » Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:12 pm

This thread made me look at my bill. I run less than $15/mature cows/year. We have custom mixed mineral with "the best" blah blah loose mineral (with salt included).
I have a friend that won't feed mineral. His cattle do all right. But, I wonder how much better they would do WITH a good mineral program???
Simme Valley of New York - http://www.SimmeValley.com
"We make a living by what we get,
we make a life by what we give."
User avatar
Jeanne - Simme Valley
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 6985
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:46 am
Location: Central Upstate New York

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby cow pollinater » Sat Apr 28, 2012 4:37 pm

It's hard to say what I have into it as my cow numbers have changed ALOT this year but nothing has gone completely without by any stretch of the imagination and I'd bet that I'm under $10.00 per head and that's with no suplemental feed at all. The only tubs that I bought were to keep cattle hanging near the corrals and 50lb sack of dry stuff in a feeder goes a looong way unless the cattle are already deficient.
cow pollinater
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 2392
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: Central CA

PreviousNext

Return to Health & Nutrition

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests

Google
 
Web CattleToday.com