anyone NOT use mineral?

Cattle problems.

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby herofan » Sun May 20, 2012 8:56 pm

Banjo wrote: Our extension agent says one should never buy a mineral that is RED because it is full of iron oxide as a cheap filler.


I switched from block to loose mineral, and now there's something else I didn't know. I've looked at some different brands and such here, and they are all reddish in color. What color is the best mineral?

rockridgecattle wrote:Finally, have you ever met a phosphorus or copper or calcium magnesium deficient cow? Let me recall from memory (15 years back).
pnemonia and matitis were issues, yes. But so were fence posts....could not keep one in the ground cause the cows ate them all....dang costly if you ask me.
Could not keep a tractor in the pasture unguarded for a moment...all the wiring stripped away in minutes...just by turning the back and taking twine off the bales


I often drive to the field on the tractor to check on and admire my 10 month old heifers. When I park, they will come over and sniff and nibble at the tires, wiring, and bush hog; however, it is casual and not hysterical; they haven't destroyed anything. They usually tarry a few minutes and move on. I assumed it was their gentle nature and curiosity. Does that sound normal?
User avatar
herofan
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:46 pm
Location: Kentucky

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby Banjo » Sun May 20, 2012 9:56 pm

hooknline wrote:
Banjo wrote:I'll have to say that is the first time I have heard that argument. The hay taking off I can understand a little bit, but never heard of livestock walking it off. On the surface it seems plausible, but they say....people in the know...universties etc. that livestock return a high % of their nutrient intake back thru the manure and urine.
Overgrazing!!!!! is what destroys pasture and I have done my share of it over the years. Pulse grazing and then letting the pasture rest/recover for a certain length of time is what builds organic matter/and carbon in the soil.
What did farmers do for the thousands of years before water soluble ferilizers came along?

Question for anyone who wants to answer it: If a plants roots has as much mass below ground as above ground what have you lost? Nothing. When that same plants roots die back/pruned after being grazed and start growing back again what have you gained? Organic matter from the old roots. What happens when that cow can continually go back over that short 2 or 3 inch grass? It will have a shallow root system to match the top, which is very vulnerable to dry weather.
I don't know everything, but this much I know.


Tell you what. Stock your land to normal capacity. Don't feed anything, don't add mineral, don't bring in any hay that hasn't been cut off the same land, and don't fertilize. Them sell all your calf
Crop, or whatever bovine product you sell.
Do that for 10 years and tell us your overall production numbers for 10 years running.
I'd bet youre bottom line drops very year

What is "Normal" stocking rate. Agmantoo says that he runs 1 cow and calf to 1.4 ac. with IRG.....thats pretty good
Most continuous grazing systems are probably 1 cow and calf to 2 to 3 ac or more depending on what part of the country you are in.
But I do plan on adding about 20 heifers that I have raised to the total herd and maybe that many more in 2 or 3 years. When cattle can roam from one end of the farm to the other any time they want, it doesn't seem to matter how many ac/hd. you have when it doesn't rain for a few weeks. The best thing I have ever done on the farm was start rotational grazing. Healthy soil= Healthy grass= Healthy cattle.
But like I said before I haven't used commercial fertilize in 6 years and the soil tests show that the soil isn't any better or worse now than it was then. My Ph is in the mid 6's range that kind of surprised me because my soil isn't deep rich soil like bottomland. If I was mining my soil wouldn't a soil test show it getting worse and worse.
In 2007 and '08 we had a pretty severe drought here and I had to buy some hay but I was continuous grazing then also but haven't had to buy any hay since then.
I plan on phasing out my haymaking over the next 2 or 3 years. If I can't graze year round, then I will buy my hay.
Trying to keep this equipment running is way too stressful. I only feed those 100 cows about 200 - 250 rolls thru the winter. So you will have to check back with me in about 4 more years and I'll give you an update.
By the way you didn't answer my questions above in my last posts.

That's my opinion.....feel free to make it yours.
User avatar
Banjo
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:14 pm
Location: Southeast, Ky

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby Banjo » Sun May 20, 2012 10:42 pm

herofan wrote:
Banjo wrote: Our extension agent says one should never buy a mineral that is RED because it is full of iron oxide as a cheap filler.


I switched from block to loose mineral, and now there's something else I didn't know. I've looked at some different brands and such here, and they are all reddish in color. What color is the best mineral?

rockridgecattle wrote:Finally, have you ever met a phosphorus or copper or calcium magnesium deficient cow? Let me recall from memory (15 years back).
pnemonia and matitis were issues, yes. But so were fence posts....could not keep one in the ground cause the cows ate them all....dang costly if you ask me.
Could not keep a tractor in the pasture unguarded for a moment...all the wiring stripped away in minutes...just by turning the back and taking twine off the bales


I often drive to the field on the tractor to check on and admire my 10 month old heifers. When I park, they will come over and sniff and nibble at the tires, wiring, and bush hog; however, it is casual and not hysterical; they haven't destroyed anything. They usually tarry a few minutes and move on. I assumed it was their gentle nature and curiosity. Does that sound normal?

Someone posted on here that the red is some kind of coloring and it isn't the iron oxide any more making it red. However, me personally I don't like anything with iron oxide in it, ferrous sulfate is better IMO. Southern States mineral is gray looking with no Iron oxide but their filler is ground limestone which is also cheap.
I don't fault any one for feeding minerals and I do think cattle do need salt,that's why I feed sea salt that has a myriad of trace minerals far more than the regular trace mineralised feed store salt..... sodium is very important at the cellular level.
If the guy whose mineral bill for 30 cows was $6000 yr then it would cost me $20000/yr. to do that for a 100 cows
If I spent $20000/yr on mineral and $20000/yr on fertilize or just half of that, then I would be better off to not get out of bed of a morning. Last year my feeders averaged $700/ea.....it would take almost 60 calves before I would see the first dime. Then if I bought several thousand dollars worth of feed and creep fed my calves and then after weaning, which i have done in the past. Where does it end!!! I might as well sell the farm if this is as good as it gets.

That's my opinion.....feel free to make it yours.
User avatar
Banjo
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:14 pm
Location: Southeast, Ky

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby 1982vett » Mon May 21, 2012 8:11 am

Banjo wrote:
herofan wrote:
Banjo wrote: Our extension agent says one should never buy a mineral that is RED because it is full of iron oxide as a cheap filler.


I switched from block to loose mineral, and now there's something else I didn't know. I've looked at some different brands and such here, and they are all reddish in color. What color is the best mineral?

rockridgecattle wrote:Finally, have you ever met a phosphorus or copper or calcium magnesium deficient cow? Let me recall from memory (15 years back).
pnemonia and matitis were issues, yes. But so were fence posts....could not keep one in the ground cause the cows ate them all....dang costly if you ask me.
Could not keep a tractor in the pasture unguarded for a moment...all the wiring stripped away in minutes...just by turning the back and taking twine off the bales


I often drive to the field on the tractor to check on and admire my 10 month old heifers. When I park, they will come over and sniff and nibble at the tires, wiring, and bush hog; however, it is casual and not hysterical; they haven't destroyed anything. They usually tarry a few minutes and move on. I assumed it was their gentle nature and curiosity. Does that sound normal?

Someone posted on here that the red is some kind of coloring and it isn't the iron oxide any more making it red. However, me personally I don't like anything with iron oxide in it, ferrous sulfate is better IMO. Southern States mineral is gray looking with no Iron oxide but their filler is ground limestone which is also cheap.
I don't fault any one for feeding minerals and I do think cattle do need salt,that's why I feed sea salt that has a myriad of trace minerals far more than the regular trace mineralised feed store salt..... sodium is very important at the cellular level.
If the guy whose mineral bill for 30 cows was $6000 yr then it would cost me $20000/yr. to do that for a 100 cows
If I spent $20000/yr on mineral and $20000/yr on fertilize or just half of that, then I would be better off to not get out of bed of a morning. Last year my feeders averaged $700/ea.....it would take almost 60 calves before I would see the first dime. Then if I bought several thousand dollars worth of feed and creep fed my calves and then after weaning, which i have done in the past. Where does it end!!! I might as well sell the farm if this is as good as it gets.


The color which is best....is the one that closet matches your needs.....color is added to easily identify one product from another....
Any man who can drive safely while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves. ~Albert Einstein
Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day. ~Harry S. Truman
User avatar
1982vett
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 6333
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby herofan » Mon May 21, 2012 2:42 pm

How exactly does one know their "needs." Can a person go to the local feed store and trust they can give you what you need, or do we have to be our own expert? How many different choices are there?
User avatar
herofan
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
 
Posts: 208
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:46 pm
Location: Kentucky

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby hooknline » Mon May 21, 2012 3:12 pm

I'm beginning to smell an alias in the mix. Not sure yet.
That light you see at the end of tunnel, it's just a freight train coming your way
User avatar
hooknline
GURU
GURU
 
Posts: 7494
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:37 pm
Location: A one light town in central Fl.

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby TexasBred » Mon May 21, 2012 4:26 pm

Banjo wrote:[ Southern States mineral is gray looking with no Iron oxide but their filler is ground limestone which is also cheap.
I don't fault any one for feeding minerals and I do think cattle do need salt,that's why I feed sea salt that has a myriad of trace minerals far more than the regular trace mineralised feed store salt..... sodium is very important at the cellular level.


Limestone is cheap but is also the primary source of much of the calcium in the mineral so is much more than a filler. Most mineral formulations are tight enough that there actually is very little room left in the formulation for fillers. The little available space is usually used for things like dried molasses, CSM or distillers to make the mineral more palatable.

All salt is sea salt. Some has just been processed a bit differently and is marketed as "latest and greatest" and probably much more expensive. Not enough minerals in any of it to consider it a a mineral supplementation.
America is one of the few places on earth where the 'poor' are overweight and have personalized ringtones
User avatar
TexasBred
Mentor
Mentor
 
Posts: 15409
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Location: Heart of Texas

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby Banjo » Mon May 21, 2012 5:47 pm

TexasBred wrote:
Banjo wrote:[ Southern States mineral is gray looking with no Iron oxide but their filler is ground limestone which is also cheap.
I don't fault any one for feeding minerals and I do think cattle do need salt,that's why I feed sea salt that has a myriad of trace minerals far more than the regular trace mineralised feed store salt..... sodium is very important at the cellular level.


Limestone is cheap but is also the primary source of much of the calcium in the mineral so is much more than a filler. Most mineral formulations are tight enough that there actually is very little room left in the formulation for fillers. The little available space is usually used for things like dried molasses, CSM or distillers to make the mineral more palatable.

All salt is sea salt. Some has just been processed a bit differently and is marketed as "latest and greatest" and probably much more expensive. Not enough minerals in any of it to consider it a a mineral supplementation.

We may have to agree to disagree on the limestone, but I think it is a poor source of calcium, but it may take a long time for it to show up, everything that goes in doesn't automatically come out. I know that goes against conventional thinking. The guy that spoke about the reason we have hard water is because the minerals are water soluble. I live in an area where there are lots of homes with well water and this a heavily limestone rock area, a neighbor told me he tried to put a water filter on his water line and it would stop up in no time. There is a mobile home that I rent out next door to me and the water heater is a fourth full of mineral, some of that is sulphur. my point is if it is water soluble then obviously it can turn back to mineral again at some point. What keeps it from doing that in a cow, or a person!

You are right about the salt. I just like the sea salt because all sea salt has lots of trace minerals in it. It may not make a bit of difference. It cost me about $9 a 50#bag. Maybe in a 100 years the cows will have trace mineralized my whole farm.

That's my opinion.....feel free to make it yours.
User avatar
Banjo
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:14 pm
Location: Southeast, Ky

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby Banjo » Tue May 22, 2012 6:54 am

herofan wrote:How exactly does one know their "needs." Can a person go to the local feed store and trust they can give you what you need, or do we have to be our own expert? How many different choices are there?


You have to use your own judgement, but it is highly unlikely that the guys at the feed store know any more than you do. I personally don't like oxides and inorganic sources like rocks. The really high quality organic and chelated minerals will start getting into your pocket pretty quick.
I think a person could feed some good alfalfa hay a couple of times a week and that would suffice IMO, but there again it starts getting expensive unless you have a few acres yourself you can bale.
Its probably not going to be the end of the world...whatever you choose to feed. The way to increase profits farming is by spending less IMO

That's my opinion.....feel free to make it yours.
User avatar
Banjo
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:14 pm
Location: Southeast, Ky

Re: anyone NOT use mineral?

Postby TexasBred » Tue May 22, 2012 9:48 am

[quote="Banjo"]We may have to agree to disagree on the limestone, but I think it is a poor source of calcium, but it may take a long time for it to show up, everything that goes in doesn't automatically come out. I know that goes against conventional thinking. The guy that spoke about the reason we have hard water is because the minerals are water soluble. I live in an area where there are lots of homes with well water and this a heavily limestone rock area, a neighbor told me he tried to put a water filter on his water line and it would stop up in no time. There is a mobile home that I rent out next door to me and the water heater is a fourth full of mineral, some of that is sulphur. my point is if it is water soluble then obviously it can turn back to mineral again at some point. What keeps it from doing that in a cow, or a person![/quote}
Banjo you're absolutely right about an animal not using everything that goes in. But like it or not most calcium in mineral will always be nothing more than limestone finely crushed. Minerals that are not water soluble will pass thru the cow and end up in your soil. Only about 15% of oxides are actually absorbed by the cow, 35% of the sulfates but more than 90% of amino acid complexes or chelates are absorbed. (Another good reason to carefully read the list of ingredients). The mineral will always meet the guarantees on the tag but the animal will not always utilize the amount shown.

I know what you mean about the water. Depending on your location sulfur can be a pretty stinky problem, West Texas is notorious for its "hard water" and East Texas for it's "soft water"....all caused by the concentration of calcium in the water, not to mention to numerous other minerals that may be in the water.
America is one of the few places on earth where the 'poor' are overweight and have personalized ringtones
User avatar
TexasBred
Mentor
Mentor
 
Posts: 15409
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Location: Heart of Texas

Previous

Return to Health & Nutrition

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 9 guests

Google
 
Web CattleToday.com