Angus: $M

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of your favorite breed.
User avatar
CreekAngus
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 8:44 pm
Location: Southwest Washington
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 219 times

Angus: $M

Post by CreekAngus » Fri May 31, 2019 8:58 am

This morning I woke up, as for the new $B scores, I don't have new cattle. The new $M, it appears is just an accumulation of the current EPD's which really tell you nothing about the maternal worth of a cow. My high indexing cattle are high valued in the $M, my lower indexing cows appear to be by the numbers, candidates for the cull pen.


A brand ins’t something you earn, it’s something you live up to - John Dutton

User avatar
CreekAngus
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2019 8:44 pm
Location: Southwest Washington
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 219 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by CreekAngus » Fri May 31, 2019 9:05 am

And don't forget to check your foot scores, you may have a bunch of cripples walking around your fields this morning. I noticed my cattle barely changed in $B, basically lost the decimal.
A brand ins’t something you earn, it’s something you live up to - John Dutton

User avatar
True Grit Farms
GURU
GURU
Posts: 9454
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 4:29 pm
Location: Middle Georgia
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 569 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by True Grit Farms » Fri May 31, 2019 9:06 am

Some you win some you loose.
If we'd of know this we'd of picked our own cotton.

User avatar
NEFarmwife
GURU
GURU
Posts: 1108
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:33 pm
Location: "The Good Life"
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 221 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by NEFarmwife » Fri May 31, 2019 10:31 am

Actually faired well on the $M.

Those who didn’t have great feet have their scores actually reflect that. So, I’m rather impressed. That is in my own herd. I can’t say, looking at a few sires that are suppose to have great feet but their scores aren’t reflecting that...

I had some pretty wide swings on $B both ways but most were within the projected changes ($6).

I’m seeing some highly touted sires not fairing very well on these changes but I’ll just sit here and sip tea.

LCBulls
Trail Boss
Trail Boss
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2018 12:18 am
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 51 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by LCBulls » Fri May 31, 2019 11:23 am

It’s definitely going to throw a wrench into a lot of Sires.
I know that the foot score EPD has me second guessing a few Sires we used. A couple of them were touted as great footed as well.
I think the claw and angle EPD is more important than the $M. Especially with how it was weighted to overcompensate for CED and CEM. The rest I basically agree with.

Till-Hill
Rancher
Rancher
Posts: 911
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:29 pm
Location: Waterville, Iowa
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 51 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by Till-Hill » Fri May 31, 2019 12:02 pm

Anyone got a list of high indexing proven bulls out yet?

User avatar
Jake
GURU
GURU
Posts: 3756
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 3:45 pm
Location: North Central Kansas
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by Jake » Fri May 31, 2019 12:08 pm

Pretty interesting seeing the sires at the bottom of the list.

User avatar
Bright Raven
GURU
GURU
Posts: 9952
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 9:57 pm
Location: Kentucky
Has thanked: 594 times
Been thanked: 590 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by Bright Raven » Fri May 31, 2019 12:19 pm

I am not an AAA member. Please, someone give a brief explanation of the reassessment of EPDs that apparently is going on. What is the type of data being used to base the revision of EPDs on? Genomic I assume? Just a guess. And are all the EPDs going through a revision?
"Looking for an honest man".
Diogenes.

Ebenezer
GURU
GURU
Posts: 1750
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 11:46 am
Location: Piedmont of SC
Has thanked: 179 times
Been thanked: 369 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by Ebenezer » Fri May 31, 2019 12:28 pm

Was glad to see that a bull I helped a friend buy last year is in the top 1%.

User avatar
Red Bull Breeder
GURU
GURU
Posts: 7621
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:26 am
Location: North Arkansas
Has thanked: 293 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by Red Bull Breeder » Fri May 31, 2019 12:32 pm

If you will go take a look at your cattle today they won't look a bit different than yesterday. Numbers change cattle don't if they work they work if not they are a cull. Seems simple to me.

User avatar
sim.-ang.king
GURU
GURU
Posts: 5083
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: Southern IL
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 409 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by sim.-ang.king » Fri May 31, 2019 12:37 pm

Just another index for the lazy breeders to use, and the big boys to market.
Why should I apologize for becoming a monster?
Did anyone apologize for making me one?

User avatar
Red Bull Breeder
GURU
GURU
Posts: 7621
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:26 am
Location: North Arkansas
Has thanked: 293 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by Red Bull Breeder » Fri May 31, 2019 12:44 pm

sim.-ang.king wrote:
Fri May 31, 2019 12:37 pm
Just another index for the lazy breeders to use, and the big boys to market.
Seems to be Sim. Never seen a number on a peice of paper make a sorry cow better or a good cow bad.

User avatar
Brookhill Angus
GURU
GURU
Posts: 2028
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 12:45 pm
Has thanked: 545 times
Been thanked: 361 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by Brookhill Angus » Fri May 31, 2019 1:03 pm

Red Bull Breeder wrote:
Fri May 31, 2019 12:44 pm
sim.-ang.king wrote:
Fri May 31, 2019 12:37 pm
Just another index for the lazy breeders to use, and the big boys to market.
Seems to be Sim. Never seen a number on a peice of paper make a sorry cow better or a good cow bad.
Keep telling yourself that line. If you are just licking your finger and eyeballing an animal, then yeah, I guess it doesn't matter.

As for Sim's remark, weren't you bloviating on how great the crossbreed genetic DNA testing was?

People flip flop on here like a fish out of water.
"When someone tells you it can't be done, it's more a reflection of their limitations, not yours"

User avatar
Brookhill Angus
GURU
GURU
Posts: 2028
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 12:45 pm
Has thanked: 545 times
Been thanked: 361 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by Brookhill Angus » Fri May 31, 2019 1:04 pm

Ebenezer wrote:
Fri May 31, 2019 12:28 pm
Was glad to see that a bull I helped a friend buy last year is in the top 1%.
Good job!
"When someone tells you it can't be done, it's more a reflection of their limitations, not yours"

User avatar
Red Bull Breeder
GURU
GURU
Posts: 7621
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:26 am
Location: North Arkansas
Has thanked: 293 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Angus: $M

Post by Red Bull Breeder » Fri May 31, 2019 1:18 pm

Brookhill Angus wrote:
Fri May 31, 2019 1:03 pm
Red Bull Breeder wrote:
Fri May 31, 2019 12:44 pm
sim.-ang.king wrote:
Fri May 31, 2019 12:37 pm
Just another index for the lazy breeders to use, and the big boys to market.
Seems to be Sim. Never seen a number on a peice of paper make a sorry cow better or a good cow bad.
Keep telling yourself that line. If you are just licking your finger and eyeballing an animal, then yeah, I guess it doesn't matter.

As for Sim's remark, weren't you bloviating on how great the crossbreed genetic DNA testing was?

People flip flop on here like a fish out of water.
I suspect i been telling myself that line a lot longer than you been breeding cattle. I have seen more changes in epd's than i care to remember. Still have not seen numbers on a piece of paper make a good cow better or worse. The animal never changes only the numbers. If she was sorry she is still sorry. If a bull was good yesterday he is still good today. The best bulls of any breed has never graced the pages of a semen catalog, and have never sired a registered calf.

Post Reply