
WichitaLineMan wrote:Got my latest Hereford World today. Page after page of the worst looking cattle imaginable. Maybe every tenth page there was a decent looking cow or bull. Mostly just crap though. This breed has a lot of work to do.



WichitaLineMan wrote:Maybe every tenth page there was a decent looking cow or bull.

DOC HARRIS wrote:WichitaLineMan wrote:Got my latest Hereford World today. Page after page of the worst looking cattle imaginable. Maybe every tenth page there was a decent looking cow or bull. Mostly just crap though. This breed has a lot of work to do.
WLM-
What is your opinion as to the reason for this situation? Is it "Phenotype" only, or are the other factors with the cattle undesirable also? Factors such as Genotype of the individuals, Functional traits, or general condition of the cattle? I have not access of the issue, so I am seeking your input.
DOC HARRIS

Hereford76 wrote:DOC HARRIS wrote:WichitaLineMan wrote:Got my latest Hereford World today. Page after page of the worst looking cattle imaginable. Maybe every tenth page there was a decent looking cow or bull. Mostly just crap though. This breed has a lot of work to do.
WLM-
What is your opinion as to the reason for this situation? Is it "Phenotype" only, or are the other factors with the cattle undesirable also? Factors such as Genotype of the individuals, Functional traits, or general condition of the cattle? I have not access of the issue, so I am seeking your input.
DOC HARRIS
Here's a good example of what WLM is probably referring to. This is just one example of what was advertised in the magazine. reed and genex are peddling semen on this dandy.
http://genex.crinet.com/addedattractions/index.php?action=DETAIL&code=90HP04633&lang=EN


WichitaLineMan wrote:Got my latest Hereford World today. Page after page of the worst looking cattle imaginable. Maybe every tenth page there was a decent looking cow or bull. Mostly just crap though. This breed has a lot of work to do.


Brandonm22 wrote:I don't see much reason too throw a lot of stones at the Bennett bull. He is a little post legged, maybe a little softer topped that I would have liked, I would like to see a little more depth of rib, and I suspect his daughters will be too big and too hard doing for my particular taste. Cross him on Angus cows and I suspect the resulting progeny will perform real well in the feedlot. I don't know if there is such a thing as a 'terminal Hereford'; but he is getting there. Carefully mated to the right set of commercial cows, I think he will work for a lot of people.

Brandonm22 wrote:I don't see much reason too throw a lot of stones at the Bennett bull. He is a little post legged, maybe a little softer topped that I would have liked, I would like to see a little more depth of rib, and I suspect his daughters will be too big and too hard doing for my particular taste. Cross him on Angus cows and I suspect the resulting progeny will perform real well in the feedlot. I don't know if there is such a thing as a 'terminal Hereford'; but he is getting there. Carefully mated to the right set of commercial cows, I think he will work for a lot of people.

KNERSIE wrote:Linebred 774 and "terminal" don't belong in the same sentence.


KNERSIE wrote:Brandonm22 wrote:I don't see much reason too throw a lot of stones at the Bennett bull. He is a little post legged, maybe a little softer topped that I would have liked, I would like to see a little more depth of rib, and I suspect his daughters will be too big and too hard doing for my particular taste. Cross him on Angus cows and I suspect the resulting progeny will perform real well in the feedlot. I don't know if there is such a thing as a 'terminal Hereford'; but he is getting there. Carefully mated to the right set of commercial cows, I think he will work for a lot of people.
Linebred 774 and "terminal" don't belong in the same sentence.

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], mbdear2 and 1 guest