Brandonm22 wrote:HerefordSire wrote:He is on CNBC every work week plus he runs a charitable trust.
I am aware of his tv job; but I am also aware that his "advice" of the past two years has been off the mark as often as not. Given his stellar past performance versus his recent performance something is missing.
Probably has a lot to do with needing to find a new stock to recommend to his viewers every day.
Incidentally, HS, the story you referenced was posted September 29th. The roulette wheel has been spun many times since then. Here is the balance of the story:
Because no one forced CIT into bankruptcy, it can live to play again, and when I read in the New York Post that Paulson owns CIT debt, I realized that he's powerful enough to save this company, particularly because he is one of the investors in IndyMac and knows his way around the bottom of the debt barrel.
These two stocks represent lottery tickets that are no longer rip-ups because they have made it out of the "critical care" stage and are recovering.
I would buy them both.
At the time of publication, Cramer had no positions in the stocks mentioned.
He has made some good picks and has picked some real duds. The trick is to gain more on the good picks than you lose on the bombs. Oh, and like passing thru some "small towns", you know, the ones you miss if you blink... Cramer can change his mind and recommendation just as fast.
Ahh---The good old days.